2005
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2005.052639
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring Temporary Immunodepression by Flow Cytometric Measurement of Monocytic HLA-DR Expression: A Multicenter Standardized Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

9
260
1
7

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 215 publications
(277 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(16 reference statements)
9
260
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Using this technology one can calculate the number of HLA-DR molecules per cell in a way which is reproducible across centers. While clinical investigators are beginning to use this method [27], it does not yet represent the standard approach in this field.…”
Section: Diagnosis and Quantification Of Immunoparalysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using this technology one can calculate the number of HLA-DR molecules per cell in a way which is reproducible across centers. While clinical investigators are beginning to use this method [27], it does not yet represent the standard approach in this field.…”
Section: Diagnosis and Quantification Of Immunoparalysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, the recovery slope of a diminished mHLA-DR expression seems interesting to investigate [16]. Second, specific (pre)analytical requirements for flow cytometric mHLA-DR analysis apply [17,18]. Both prolonged sample transportation times (more than 4 h) and transportation at room temperature induce a non-specific mHLA-DR increase and may impede precise measurements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both prolonged sample transportation times (more than 4 h) and transportation at room temperature induce a non-specific mHLA-DR increase and may impede precise measurements. Third, flow cytometric mHLA-DR assessment should be performed by using a newly available standardised quantitative test (mHLA-DR in molecules/cell; coefficient of variation: intra-lab 3%, inter-lab 18%) [17]. This may allow interlab data comparison.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inconsistent results rendered comparisons between centers virtually impossible. A kit for the quantification of the mean expression of HLA-DR in circulating monocytes is now commercially available, which has very significantly decreased intra-and inter-assay variability [17]. It requires access to a flow cytometer, however, and is therefore not exactly a simple bedside test.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%