Abstract:SummaryA narrative review was carried out to identify articles on monitoring of teamwork, with particular relevance to anaesthetists. The papers reviewed showed that team monitoring takes place both implicitly and explicitly in the anaesthetic environment. No single optimal model of teamwork monitoring for all situations was identified. Most of the studies identified were of a pre-intervention, post-intervention design, without randomisation or control group. Information shared during a formal briefing is more… Show more
“…Respectful team communication and adaptability between different professional identities in the OR team can increase OR efficiency (Kaldheim & Slettebø, ; Weller & Boyd, ). Thus, the OR team can compensate for unexpected delays that may arise, for example in the case of patients with challenging anatomy (Rutherford, ). This study also revealed that OR nurses are reluctant to lead the OR team, regardless of how long experience they have and even in situations where they have most knowledge, for example positioning the patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Team skills and team behaviour in the OR have also been improved by team training (Gillespie, Chaboyer, & Murray, ; Nurok, Lipsitz, Satwicz, Kelly, & Frankel, ; Rutherford, ; Weaver et al, ). All inter‐professional team members must be included in teaching, simulation and implementation of tools and strategies (Baker, Salas, Battles, & King, ).…”
Aim
To explore Norwegian operating room nurses’ perceptions of how team skills in the inter‐professional operating room team influence perioperative nursing in relation to patient safety.
Design
A qualitative, descriptive study based on interviews.
Methods
Ten operating room nurses (N = 10) employed in four Norwegian hospitals were interviewed individually. A qualitative inductive content analysis was conducted. The study was reported adhering to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research Checklist.
Results
Three generic categories, containing three subcategories each, were identified illuminate the operating room nurses’ perceptions. The operating room team's team skills influence on (a) the quality of perioperative nursing, about task performance, result for the patient and learning; (b) the progress of perioperative nursing, by keeping focus on the task, being prepared and task distribution and (c) the operating room nurses’ work environment in the operating room, including confidence, stress and energy use and irritation or job satisfaction.
“…Respectful team communication and adaptability between different professional identities in the OR team can increase OR efficiency (Kaldheim & Slettebø, ; Weller & Boyd, ). Thus, the OR team can compensate for unexpected delays that may arise, for example in the case of patients with challenging anatomy (Rutherford, ). This study also revealed that OR nurses are reluctant to lead the OR team, regardless of how long experience they have and even in situations where they have most knowledge, for example positioning the patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Team skills and team behaviour in the OR have also been improved by team training (Gillespie, Chaboyer, & Murray, ; Nurok, Lipsitz, Satwicz, Kelly, & Frankel, ; Rutherford, ; Weaver et al, ). All inter‐professional team members must be included in teaching, simulation and implementation of tools and strategies (Baker, Salas, Battles, & King, ).…”
Aim
To explore Norwegian operating room nurses’ perceptions of how team skills in the inter‐professional operating room team influence perioperative nursing in relation to patient safety.
Design
A qualitative, descriptive study based on interviews.
Methods
Ten operating room nurses (N = 10) employed in four Norwegian hospitals were interviewed individually. A qualitative inductive content analysis was conducted. The study was reported adhering to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research Checklist.
Results
Three generic categories, containing three subcategories each, were identified illuminate the operating room nurses’ perceptions. The operating room team's team skills influence on (a) the quality of perioperative nursing, about task performance, result for the patient and learning; (b) the progress of perioperative nursing, by keeping focus on the task, being prepared and task distribution and (c) the operating room nurses’ work environment in the operating room, including confidence, stress and energy use and irritation or job satisfaction.
“…Coordination can be defined as the sequencing, synchronization and integration of team members' activities to ensure task accomplishment (Cannon-Bowers et al 1995;Rousseau et al 2006). It is the result of either an explicit effort by the team members which requires some kind of interaction between the members, or something that happens implicitly as an effect of standardized procedures and shared mental models (Johnson et al 2011;Rutherford 2017). Cooperation, by contrast, is defined as multiple team members working together on the same task accomplishment (Yeatts and Hyten 1998).…”
Section: Models Of Team Performance and Effectivenessmentioning
Automation is the holy grail of performance assessment. Cheap and reliable automated systems that produce consistent feedback on performance. Many such systems have been proposed that accurately measure the state of a product or the outcome of a process. Procedural faults can be detected and even mitigated without the need for human interference. In production industry and professional sports, this is a natural part of business. However, in macrocognitive team performance studies, human appraisal is still king. This study investigates the reliability of human observers as assessors of performance among virtual teams, and what they base their assessments on when only able to monitor one of the team members at a time. The results show that expert observers put a lot of emphasis on task outcomes and on communication and are generally reliable raters of team performance, but there are several aspects that they cannot rate reliably under these circumstances, e.g., team workload, stress, and collaborative problem-solving. Through simple algorithms, this study shows that by capturing task scores and different quantitative communication metrics, team performance ratings can be estimated to closely match how the expert observers assess team performance in a virtual team setting. The implication of the study is that numeric team performance estimations can be acquired by automated systems, with reasonable accuracy and reliability compared to observer ratings.
“…Attention was also devoted to organisational elements in monitoring (see Rutherford's article in this Supplement for further discussion of how to monitor the team ). An aspirational recommendation was included to encourage anaesthetic departments to allow anaesthetists working alone during long procedures to be relieved for meal and comfort breaks.…”
Section: Updates As Driven By Research: the Role Of This Supplementmentioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.