Monitoring Sustainability Effects of the Bioeconomy: A Material Flow Based Approach Using the Example of Softwood Lumber and Its Core Product Epal 1 Pallet

Abstract

The transition of our current economic system towards a bioeconomy that is based on renewable materials and energy can be an important contribution but at the same time a threat to mitigate the challenges of the 21st century, such as global warming and resource depletion. To assess societal, economic, and environmental impacts associated with this transition, we propose an approach for a sustainability assessment as an integral part of a future bioeconomy monitoring concept. The assessment approach is based on material flow analyses of the bioeconomy and their core products. As a proof of applicability, the proposed assessment approach is exemplified for the material flow of softwood lumber and its core product ‘EPAL 1 pallet’. To simulate a frequent monitoring, material flow analysis and assessment of six sustainability effects are applied for the years 2010 and 2015. Since a frequent bioeconomy monitoring requires regularly updated and quality assured data, official statistics should be the major source of information. Whereas cutoff thresholds, nondisclosure of data, and high level of aggregation are major limitations of official production statistics and for material flow analysis, lack of information regarding environmental effects is the major limitation for material flow related sustainability assessment. We make suggestions on how to overcome these limitations and put our approach in to context with other ongoing monitoring activities.

Reconstruction of the SDGs Measurement Model Based on Socio-Ecological Perspective Technology for a Sustainable Green Economy

“…For example, pollution disposal to other areas outside of pollution sources, pollution released by export and import shipments, and so on. Therefore, socio-ecological indicators can be related to the effects of pollution disposal from waste production centers to other areas and the accumulation of pollution originating from external activities outside certain areas [22]. The problem of environmental damage tends to be ignored in the economic and social activities of the community.…”

An output-based measurement of EU bioeconomy services: Marrying statistics with policy insight

“…Finally, whilst this study sheds light on the economic performance of bioeconomy services, interpreting a growing bioeconomy size as a policy objective per se would not be correct. The socio-economic dimension of bioeconomy services has to be assessed jointly with a comprehensive framework of indicators that reflect stakeholder perceptions of the term "sustainability" ( Egenolf and Bringezu 2019 ; Schweinle et al., 2020 ). For example, the growth of nature tourism, as any activity related with the natural environment, may lead to degradation of the natural environment and the alteration or destruction of landscapes and biological resources ( Capocchi et al., 2019 ).…”

Comparative life cycle assessment of first‐ and second‐generation bio‐isobutene as a drop‐in substitute for fossil isobutene

“…Although LCA has proven to be a strong decision support tool in process design, the benefits and burdens of bio‐based IBN do not end with the quantitative analysis of environmental impacts. Therefore, accompanying approaches such as a life cycle sustainability assessment, which also includes social and economic aspects, 72,73 are recommended to provide a more holistic view.…”