2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring spatiotemporal variations in nutrients in a large drinking water reservoir and their relationships with hydrological and meteorological conditions based on Landsat 8 imagery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking R 2 as the comparison standard of retrieval accuracy, this research surveyed most existing publications regarding the retrieval of TP, TN and COD from 2000 to present and compared the performance of the proposed method in this research with previous research works, Figure 12 shows the results of comparison. Since the average R 2 of TP in the existing publications [21,22,[24][25][26][27]29] was 0.653, the performance of TP retrieval was improved by about 44% over the average of the past research works. For TN, the average R 2 in the existing publications [21, [23][24][25][26][27] was 0.613, and the performance of TN retrieval in this research was improved by 43% over the average of the past research works.…”
Section: Comparison Of Retrieval Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Taking R 2 as the comparison standard of retrieval accuracy, this research surveyed most existing publications regarding the retrieval of TP, TN and COD from 2000 to present and compared the performance of the proposed method in this research with previous research works, Figure 12 shows the results of comparison. Since the average R 2 of TP in the existing publications [21,22,[24][25][26][27]29] was 0.653, the performance of TP retrieval was improved by about 44% over the average of the past research works. For TN, the average R 2 in the existing publications [21, [23][24][25][26][27] was 0.613, and the performance of TN retrieval in this research was improved by 43% over the average of the past research works.…”
Section: Comparison Of Retrieval Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the average R 2 of TP in the existing publications [21,22,[24][25][26][27]29] was 0.653, the performance of TP retrieval was improved by about 44% over the average of the past research works. For TN, the average R 2 in the existing publications [21, [23][24][25][26][27] was 0.613, and the performance of TN retrieval in this research was improved by 43% over the average of the past research works. For COD, the average R 2 in the past research works [17][18][19][20] was 0.722, and the performance of retrieval COD in this research was slightly higher than the upper quartile of the past research works.…”
Section: Comparison Of Retrieval Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From each water sample, 1 L was extracted to determine the TSS concentration, and sample filtration was performed with pre-weighed filters of 45-µm porosity and 47-mm diameter. The TSS concentration of every water sample was obtained as a function of the filtered water volume in mg/L by comparing the weight before and after filtration [27].…”
Section: Collection Of Water Samples and Laboratory Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the influence of the TP concentration on the observed spectrum and remote sensing monitoring procedures is not yet clear, TP is closely related to many substances that affect the reflection spectra [9][10][11][12]. The TP could affect the growth and reproduction of plankton in the water [13], in addition, TP is associated with optical active constituents (OACs) in the water, including the SPM, Chla and chromogenic dissolved organic matter (CDOM) [12,14,15]. These three substances are the main substances that determine the optical characteristics of the water bodies [16][17][18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%