2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12517-022-09947-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring seasonal effects in vegetation areas with Sentinel-1 SAR and Sentinel-2 optic satellite images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there are other methods to evaluate the vegetation, such as the use of LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) images, in this study the most feasible was the use of satellite images, due to the scale to be evaluated; and it is suitably viable since it provides us with information on areas with and without timber forest management. Using Sentinel 2 satellite images in vegetated areas significantly increases estimate accuracy ( Polat, Akcay & Balik Sanli, 2022 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although there are other methods to evaluate the vegetation, such as the use of LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) images, in this study the most feasible was the use of satellite images, due to the scale to be evaluated; and it is suitably viable since it provides us with information on areas with and without timber forest management. Using Sentinel 2 satellite images in vegetated areas significantly increases estimate accuracy ( Polat, Akcay & Balik Sanli, 2022 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through remote sensing, it is possible to extract information about the vegetation in pine-oak forests that are unmanaged and classify the vegetation more easily that through observation methods ( Ancira-Sánchez & Treviño Garza, 2015 ; Polat, Akcay & Balik Sanli, 2022 ). However, factors such as topography, altitude, slope, precipitation, and temperature must always be considered, as indicated in Olthoff, Martinez-Ruiz & Alday (2016) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%