2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.07.09.21257475
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring SARS-CoV-2 variants alterations in Nice neighborhoods by wastewater nanopore sequencing

Abstract: BackgroundWastewater surveillance has been proposed as an epidemiological tool to define the prevalence and evolution of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemics. However, most implemented SARS-CoV-2 wastewater surveillance projects were relying on qPCR measurement of virus titers and did not address the mutational spectrum of SARS-CoV-2 circulating in the population.MethodsWe have implemented a nanopore RNA sequencing monitoring system in the city of Nice (France, 550,000 inhabitants). Between October 2020 and March 2021, we… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We were thus able to observe a comparable distribution among patients from the whole city of Marseille and in the RS wastewater network and a comparable distribution among patients living in the district corresponding to B7 and in the B7 wastewater network. More general, very recently published national studies carried out in the Netherlands and Belgium and several nations/cities in the UK have reached the same conclusions [42,45,46]. The results using the Bio-T Kit ® SARS-CoV-2 screening kit were less precise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We were thus able to observe a comparable distribution among patients from the whole city of Marseille and in the RS wastewater network and a comparable distribution among patients living in the district corresponding to B7 and in the B7 wastewater network. More general, very recently published national studies carried out in the Netherlands and Belgium and several nations/cities in the UK have reached the same conclusions [42,45,46]. The results using the Bio-T Kit ® SARS-CoV-2 screening kit were less precise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…In this paper, we demonstrate that the analysis of SARS-CoV-2 variants from wastewater by next-generation sequencing is a powerful tool capable of improving our understanding of the outbreak transmission dynamics and, also, of reducing the burden of COVID-19. Rios et al recently showed efficient SARS-CoV2 variant monitoring in the wastewater network of Nice, France by using Nanopore technology [45]. Herein, we demonstrated the key importance of the optimisation of storage and the pre-treatment conditions combined with a sequencing technology (NOVASEQ) providing a great depth of sequencing and, thus, being able to detect minority variants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Furthermore, the quality criteria in those studies were not evaluated using a defined population (Izquierdo-Lara et al, 2020;Jahn et al, 2021). Izquierdo-Lara used a minimum depth coverage of 50× and minimum AF of 10% (Izquierdo-Lara et al, 2021), while Rios et al (2021) adopted a minimum depth coverage of 100× without indicating an AF threshold. Based on the results in this study, these recommendations appear not sufficiently strict as a sequencing coverage of 100× and 250× at an AF of 20 and 10% respectively was required to observe all LFV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EU recommends the generation of one million reads per sample and a read length of more than 100 bp (European Commission, 2021). A few studies evaluated LFV in wastewater samples, by using local haplotype reconstruction with ShoRAH (Jahn et al, 2021) or iVar and setting up a minimum coverage of 50×, Phred score of ≥30 and a minimal allelic frequency (AF) of 10% (Izquierdo-Lara et al, 2021) or a minimum base quality filter of 20 with a minimum coverage of 100× (Rios et al, 2021). However, none of these studies evaluated their approach on well-defined populations nor determined detection thresholds for retaining LFV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As soon as viral genomes of VOCs become available within the international scientific community, e.g., via GISAID (Elbe & Buckland-Merrett, 2017), variant-specific PCR primers and probes can be developed and deployed on regularly collected wastewater samples to understand the dynamics of community disease burden caused by VOCs (Peterson et al 2022). While sequencing viral genomes from wastewater is technically feasible, either via targeted amplicon tiling protocols (Rios et al 2021; Lin et al 2021) or shotgun metagenomics (Rothman et al 2021; Pérez-Cataluña et al 2022), these comprehensive approaches are significantly more costly and time consuming than targeted RT-qPCR screening of RNA extracted from wastewater that can provide accurate data on VOCs at a fraction of the cost, and in near-real time. In Alberta wastewater is sampled, processed and analyzed in university laboratories in Calgary and Edmonton, and reported to health officials and online to the public two days after sampling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%