2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.08.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring riverine thermal regimes on stream networks: Insights into spatial sampling designs from the Snoqualmie River, WA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stream temperature predictions were made twice daily to represent daily minimum (6 am) and maximum (6 pm) temperatures. Details about the empirical data and model construction are provided in Steel et al (2016) and Marsha et al (2018), and summarized here. Predictions were based on observations of water temperature monitored every 30 min at >40 locations throughout the mainstem, the three forks, and other tributaries ( Fig.…”
Section: Thermal Regimesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stream temperature predictions were made twice daily to represent daily minimum (6 am) and maximum (6 pm) temperatures. Details about the empirical data and model construction are provided in Steel et al (2016) and Marsha et al (2018), and summarized here. Predictions were based on observations of water temperature monitored every 30 min at >40 locations throughout the mainstem, the three forks, and other tributaries ( Fig.…”
Section: Thermal Regimesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result is not surprising as larger watersheds generally encompass higher variation in river/landscape characteristics which create challenges to modeling. Fewer sites per watershed than suggested by the sensitivity analysis would likely be required if training datasets contained fewer gaps and if logger locations were chosen to cover spatial gradients (Marsha et al 2018). Sensitivity analyses suggested that at least four years of data was sufficient; however, including longer time-series and more diverse climate years would PeerJ reviewing PDF | (2019:03:36199:1:1:NEW 2 Aug 2019)…”
Section: Discussion Interactions and Modeling Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spatial modeling techniques, which utilize statistical auto-correlation to describe how upstream sites influence downstream sites, have recently become popular to predict stream temperature across entire watersheds (e.g., Peterson et al 2013, Isaak et al 2014, Jackson et al 2017. Most spatial modeling techniques require dense monitoring networks (Marsha et al 2018) and, with a few exceptions (e.g., Jackson et al 2018, Hocking et al 2018, primarily been used to predict temporally summarized metrics, such as the mean August max weekly temperature (Isaak et al 2017) or the maximum weekly mean stream temperature (Ruesch et al 2012), as opposed to continuous estimates of temperature. This is likely a consequence of spatial correlations and covariate relationships changing with climatic variability (Steel et al 2016, Jackson et al 2018.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This led to the development of covariance functions that are specifically designed to describe the unique spatial relationships found in streams data [4,10]. Geostatistical models fit to streams data describe a number of in-stream relationships in a way that is scientifically consistent with the hydrological features of natural streams and, as such, are increasingly being used for broad-scale monitoring and modelling of stream networks; see, for example, Isaak et al [11] and Marsha et al [12], both model temperature in streams, with Marsha et al [12] further considering questions of site placement and sample size based on their data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%