2024
DOI: 10.31851/sainmatika.v21i1.14849
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring of Togeanensis Babirusa (Babyrousa togeanensis) Population in Togean Islands National Park

Yusuf Yusuf,
Abdul Rosyid,
I Nengah Korja
et al.

Abstract: Babyrousa togeanensis is an endemic wildlife of Sulawesi Island, Indonesia. Government development programs and the increased activities of local communities in the Togean Islands National Park area are causing this animal habitat to be narrowed. Monitoring the Babyrousa togeanensis population is crucial to updating their numbers in protected areas to avoid extinction. This study used direct and indirect observation methods to investigate the Babirusa population at Urulepe Point, Togean Island. Our study showe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…True monitoring programs are different from surveillance activities in that the latter lacks the robust approach required to effectively assess the attainment of a given objective (Elzinga et al 1998). However, surveillance activities are often mislabeled as monitoring (e.g., Yusuf et al 2024), which may explain why many socalled monitoring programs may be inadequate for achieving conservation goals (Legg and Nagy 2006). Accurately designed monitoring protocols can detect trends (i.e., population change) as a means to verify whether conservation programs are on track with the management goals, such as maintaining or increasing population size, or if a decline is inevitable, what the acceptable rate is (Kleiman et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…True monitoring programs are different from surveillance activities in that the latter lacks the robust approach required to effectively assess the attainment of a given objective (Elzinga et al 1998). However, surveillance activities are often mislabeled as monitoring (e.g., Yusuf et al 2024), which may explain why many socalled monitoring programs may be inadequate for achieving conservation goals (Legg and Nagy 2006). Accurately designed monitoring protocols can detect trends (i.e., population change) as a means to verify whether conservation programs are on track with the management goals, such as maintaining or increasing population size, or if a decline is inevitable, what the acceptable rate is (Kleiman et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%