2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2022.100524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring of the presence of EGFR-mutated DNA during EGFR-targeted therapy may assist in the prediction of treatment outcome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results show that ctDNA baseline load as well as dynamics can be prognostic, and that ctDNA clearance at C3 portends better outcomes. This is consistent with results in previous studies, which also show that molecular progression can predate and predict clinical progression [33][34][35]. The role that sequential assessment of ctDNA should play moving forward remains to be seen.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Our results show that ctDNA baseline load as well as dynamics can be prognostic, and that ctDNA clearance at C3 portends better outcomes. This is consistent with results in previous studies, which also show that molecular progression can predate and predict clinical progression [33][34][35]. The role that sequential assessment of ctDNA should play moving forward remains to be seen.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Two meta-analyses demonstrated a pooled specificity of 93.5–98% and a sensitivity of 67.4–68% for cfDNA, when plasma samples were tested to determine the EGFR mutational status compared with matched tumor tissues [ 23 , 25 ]. The cobas ® EGFR Mutation Test v2 is easy to operate and stable for the screening of plasma EGFR mutations in routine clinical settings [ 3 , 26 ], compared with the limitations associated with NGS in liquid biopsy, such as limited equipment availability, cumbersome assay, and a long turnaround time [ 27 ]. However, RT-PCR or emulsion PCR techniques, such as digital Bead Emulsion Amplification and Magnetic (BEAMing) and ddPCR, are not suitable for analyzing the complex and multiple genomic aberrations emerging as relevant targets for precision medicine in NSCLC [ 28 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these, 14 cohorts from 11 studies that reported on 1359 patients described the association of baseline ctDNA levels and clinical outcomes and were grouped into Category A (Cat A) studies [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. The other 18 cohorts from 16 studies that reported on 1659 patients that described the association of dynamic changes in ctDNA with clinical outcomes were grouped as Category B (Cat B) studies [29,32,34,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48]. To note, six studies [29,32,[34][35][36]44] qualified for both categories and hence were included in both categories, respectively.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other 18 cohorts from 16 studies that reported on 1659 patients that described the association of dynamic changes in ctDNA with clinical outcomes were grouped as Category B (Cat B) studies [29,32,34,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48]. To note, six studies [29,32,[34][35][36]44] qualified for both categories and hence were included in both categories, respectively. Data from all 27 studies analysed PFS, 19 cohorts considered OS (5 in Cat A [29,32,35,36,44] and 14 in Cat B [29,[34][35][36][38][39][40][42][43][44][45]48].…”
Section: Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%