Abstract:The fusion transcript AML1/ETO corresponding to translocation t(8;21)(q22;q22) can be found in approximately 7-12% of childhood de novo AML. Despite the favorable prognosis, some of these patients relapse. Most of MRD studies so far were performed on adults treated not uniformly. Therefore, we analyzed the follow-up of 15 AML1/ETO-positive children using real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RQ-RT-PCR), all enrolled in the multicenter therapy trial AML-BFM 98. AML1/ ETO copy numbers were normalized… Show more
“…The protocol will prospectively evaluate the prognostic importance of in vitro drug resistance and MRD levels at different time points. [27][28][29] This may help us to identify new subgroups in AML, which may benefit from different therapeutic strategies.…”
In all, 447 children with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) have been treated on three consecutive NOPHO studies from July 1984 to December 2001. NOPHO-AML 84 was of moderate intensity with an induction of three courses of cytarabine, 6-thioguanine and doxorubicin followed by four consolidation courses with high-dose cytarabine. The 5-year event-free survival (EFS), disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 29, 37 and 38%. NOPHO-AML 88 was of high intensity with the addition of etoposide and mitoxantrone in selected courses during induction and consolidation. The interval between the induction courses should be as short as possible, that is, time intensity was introduced. The 5-year EFS, DFS and OS were 41, 48 and 46%. In NOPHO-AML 93, the treatment was stratified according to response to first induction course. The protocol utilised the same induction blocks as NOPHO-AML 88, but after the first block, children with a hypoplastic, nonleukaemic bone marrow were allowed to recover before the second block. Consolidation was identical with NOPHO-AML 88. The 5-year EFS, DFS and OS in NOPHO-AML 93 were 48, 52 and 65%. The new NOPHO-AML protocol has been based on experiences from previous protocols with stratification of patients with regard to in vivo response and specific cytogenetic aberrations.
“…The protocol will prospectively evaluate the prognostic importance of in vitro drug resistance and MRD levels at different time points. [27][28][29] This may help us to identify new subgroups in AML, which may benefit from different therapeutic strategies.…”
In all, 447 children with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) have been treated on three consecutive NOPHO studies from July 1984 to December 2001. NOPHO-AML 84 was of moderate intensity with an induction of three courses of cytarabine, 6-thioguanine and doxorubicin followed by four consolidation courses with high-dose cytarabine. The 5-year event-free survival (EFS), disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 29, 37 and 38%. NOPHO-AML 88 was of high intensity with the addition of etoposide and mitoxantrone in selected courses during induction and consolidation. The interval between the induction courses should be as short as possible, that is, time intensity was introduced. The 5-year EFS, DFS and OS were 41, 48 and 46%. In NOPHO-AML 93, the treatment was stratified according to response to first induction course. The protocol utilised the same induction blocks as NOPHO-AML 88, but after the first block, children with a hypoplastic, nonleukaemic bone marrow were allowed to recover before the second block. Consolidation was identical with NOPHO-AML 88. The 5-year EFS, DFS and OS in NOPHO-AML 93 were 48, 52 and 65%. The new NOPHO-AML protocol has been based on experiences from previous protocols with stratification of patients with regard to in vivo response and specific cytogenetic aberrations.
“…24 However, recently, several studies strongly suggested that RQ-RT-PCR might be a more valuable technique to predict relapse in AML with core binding factor (CBF) rearrangement in general or in t(8;21) AML. 13,14,[25][26][27] In those studies, critical thresholds of MRD levels, which could distinguish between patients at risk of relapse and those in continuous CR, were identified. In the present study, no pretreatment characteristics were predictive of the outcome, possibly due to the relatively low number of patients.…”
Section: Prognostic Value Of Rq-pcr In Amlmentioning
Despite the favorable prognosis of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with t(8;21)(q22;q22) translocation, relapses still occur in about 30% of the cases but no initial factors can strongly predict the risk of relapse. Several recent studies suggest that monitoring minimal residual disease (MRD) may identify patients at risk of relapse. We prospectively monitored AML1-ETO rearrangement by real-time quantitative PCR (RQ-PCR) in 21 patients uniformly treated in our center. Blood (PB) and bone marrow (BM) samples were collected during and after therapy. At diagnosis, levels of AML1-ETO transcript showed large variations and there was a trend for a higher relapse rate in patients with high pretreatment expression levels (P ¼ 0.065). After induction therapy, absolute transcript levels (below 10 À3 , compared to Kasumi cell line), or a greater than 3 log decrease by comparison to diagnosis levels, were significant predictors of the absence of relapse (P ¼ 0.02 and P ¼ 0.02, respectively). MRD levels after consolidation therapy were also significant indicators of relapse (P ¼ 10 À5 ). Comparison of BM and PB samples showed similar sensitivity for detecting AML1-ETO transcript. In conclusion, RQ-PCR appears to be an early predictive factor of the relapse risk in AML with t(8;21). PB samples can be used adequately to evaluate the level of MRD by this technique.
“…3 A study in childhood AML of 15 patients also showed that RUNX1-RUNX1T1 increased transcript levels are predictive of relapse. 188 MLL fusion transcripts for MRD monitoring have also been analyzed in 19 patients with t(9;11)(q22;q23) AML. Eleven of these patients showed negative PCR for the MLL fusion transcripts, and this associated with a better outcome.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.