2021
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013335.pub2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring of gastric residual volume during enteral nutrition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These articles have been questioned with regard to clinical relevance and because they fail to show a reduction in occurrence of VAP. Furthermore, a prospective interventional trial by Reignier et al ( 13 ), which included 449 patients, and a meta-analysis (including 7 clinical trials) of 1,585 patients by Yasuda et al ( 33 ) showed that measurement of GRV led to a reduction in intake by stopping EF and that this practice had no impact on 30-day survival of critically ill patients, length of stay, or even on the occurrence of gastric intolerance ( 33 ). Measurement of GRV by aspiration is, therefore, no longer recommended or may not be required as part of routine care to monitor critically ill patients on EF, as stated by the ASPEN guidelines ( 34 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These articles have been questioned with regard to clinical relevance and because they fail to show a reduction in occurrence of VAP. Furthermore, a prospective interventional trial by Reignier et al ( 13 ), which included 449 patients, and a meta-analysis (including 7 clinical trials) of 1,585 patients by Yasuda et al ( 33 ) showed that measurement of GRV led to a reduction in intake by stopping EF and that this practice had no impact on 30-day survival of critically ill patients, length of stay, or even on the occurrence of gastric intolerance ( 33 ). Measurement of GRV by aspiration is, therefore, no longer recommended or may not be required as part of routine care to monitor critically ill patients on EF, as stated by the ASPEN guidelines ( 34 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gastric point of care ultrasound value to guide enteral nutrition in critically ill patients FI definitions are inconsistently described in the literature but are a common finding among critically ill adults [15]. FI is most frequently defined as the presence of gastrointestinal symptoms and raised GRV.…”
Section: Andandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GRV has been widely used in clinical practice as an essential indicator of gastrointestinal motility and enteral nutrition tolerance. Recent studies have questioned the rationality of monitoring GRV routinely in critically ill patients [15]. With the widespread clinical application of harmless monitoring technologies such as ultrasound, gastric suctioning may be used less and less [16].…”
Section: Andandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…також доведено, що езХ у пацієнтів з тяжким перебігом гП слід починати якомога раніше (24-48 годин від моменту госпіталізації), що дає можливість знизити частоту інфекційних ускладнень на 24% та смертності на 32% [11]. однак дотримання зазначених рекомендацій небезпечне розвитком кишкових ускладнень у вигляді великих залишкових об'ємів у 39% пацієнтів [12]. використання антифлатулентів у складі суміші для езХ на першому етапі, зменшення об'ємів суміші та уникнення застосування концентрованих розчинів на другому етапі та перехід на парентеральне харчування на третьому етапі лікування дає можливість уникнути розвитку акс у даної категорії хворих.…”
Section: рис 1 тенденція змін середніх значень внутрішньочеревного ти...unclassified