For African countries to make the environmental impact assessment (EIA)
I. IntroductionAlthough significant progress has been made in the use of environmental impact assessments (EIAs) in Africa, much more work is needed to improve their efficacy as a tool to identify the positive and negative impacts of a project and to enhance or mitigate those outcomes accordingly (Kakonge, 2012). One challenge impeding the EIA process is the need for more effective communication of the findings and recommendations of EIA reports to all stakeholders. This shortcoming is partly attributable to the multidisciplinary nature of EIAs, which can lead to communication problems during implementation. In particular, the interpretation of existing environmental problems can vary greatly because information about them is not adequately communicated. Studies by Seeley and Adams (1988) and others, for example, indicate that the communication of findings and recommendations of EIA reports is complicated, in particular, by the different levels of expertise of those providing and those receiving the information. Holgate (1984) goes further by saying that the EIA process is often more limited by poor communication between planners and ecologists than by deficiencies in ecological knowledge. EIA findings and recommendations have generally not been effectively communicated in Africa, for example, because of the low level of public involvement and participation in the EIA process (Kakonge, 1999) or because less attention has been paid to the role of the public in the process in general.Given the current investment being made in the EIA process, this problem of communication urgently needs attention by all concerned governments, the private sector and the public. This short paper highlights the importance of effectively communicating the findings and recommendations of EIA reports, identifies impediments to their effective communication, and offers strategies to improve the EIA process.