2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring of cleanliness and disinfection in dairies: Comparison of traditional microbiological and ATP bioluminescence methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Higher RLU values can be caused by ATP, which comes from organic dirt (Ayc ßic ßek et al, 2006). Carrascosa et al (2012) studied the monitoring of cleanliness and disinfection in dairies by comparing traditional microbiological and ATP bioluminescence methods finding no correlation between traditional (standard) and ATP-BM methods, because of the ATP from organic debris. Therefore, using this method can show some surfaces to be dirtier than if using the standard method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher RLU values can be caused by ATP, which comes from organic dirt (Ayc ßic ßek et al, 2006). Carrascosa et al (2012) studied the monitoring of cleanliness and disinfection in dairies by comparing traditional microbiological and ATP bioluminescence methods finding no correlation between traditional (standard) and ATP-BM methods, because of the ATP from organic debris. Therefore, using this method can show some surfaces to be dirtier than if using the standard method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…et al, 2012). Lastly, microbiological control is an important tool that must be used to check that surfaces have been cleaned properly, coupled with a disinfection program within the framework of a self-monitoring HACCP (Carrascosa et al, 2012).…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are no standards available for fomites surface counts. However, a general microbial target value of <2.5 CFU/cm 2 after disinfection has been found to be attainable for a range of surfaces in food industries (Carrascosa et al 2012). The preliminary data obtained in this study showed that the total viable counts in non-disinfected objects were considerably higher.…”
Section: Microbiological Analysis and Identificationmentioning
confidence: 56%