2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-017-4454-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring of audio visual quality by key indicators

Abstract: Over 10 billion hours of video are watched online every month. Together with high definition television broadcasting and the rise in high quality video on demand, this makes quality assessment a key task in the global multimedia market. Automating quality checking is currently based on finding major audiovisual artefacts. The Monitoring Of Audio Visual quality by key Indicators (MOAVI) subgroup of the Video Quality Experts Group (VQEG) is an open collaborative project for developing No-Reference models for mon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed Video IQAs are rather far of classic IQAs [ 27 ], since they use spatio-temporal metrics, discussed in VQEG, and they are mainly devoted to compressed videos (MPEGs). Some recent works, more oriented to CGIs [ 28 ], and using a specific dataset (MOAVI) have been presented. Nevertheless these works are devoted to specific artifacts, and the MOAVI project seems to be difficult to apply for the detection of Monte Carlo noise at the moment, thus these techniques have not been used.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed Video IQAs are rather far of classic IQAs [ 27 ], since they use spatio-temporal metrics, discussed in VQEG, and they are mainly devoted to compressed videos (MPEGs). Some recent works, more oriented to CGIs [ 28 ], and using a specific dataset (MOAVI) have been presented. Nevertheless these works are devoted to specific artifacts, and the MOAVI project seems to be difficult to apply for the detection of Monte Carlo noise at the moment, thus these techniques have not been used.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%