2019
DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics11090487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring of Antimicrobial Drug Chloramphenicol Release from Electrospun Nano- and Microfiber Mats Using UV Imaging and Bacterial Bioreporters

Abstract: New strategies are continuously sought for the treatment of skin and wound infections due to increased problems with non-healing wounds. Electrospun nanofiber mats with antibacterial agents as drug delivery systems provide opportunities for the eradication of bacterial infections as well as wound healing. Antibacterial activities of such mats are directly linked with their drug release behavior. Traditional pharmacopoeial drug release testing settings are not always suitable for analyzing the release behavior … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 26–28 ] For example, CAM‐loaded polycaprolactone (PCL) nanofibers and, especially, PCL‐ polyethylene oxide (PEO) and microfiber exhibited a very fast release in PBS, reaching in 1 h more than 30% and 90%, respectively. [ 26 ] The difference between such two systems was attributed to the hydrophobic and hydrophilic nature of PCL and PCL‐PEO fibers, respectively. In any case, the strength of the interaction between CAM and such polymers was significantly weaker than with PEDOT.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 26–28 ] For example, CAM‐loaded polycaprolactone (PCL) nanofibers and, especially, PCL‐ polyethylene oxide (PEO) and microfiber exhibited a very fast release in PBS, reaching in 1 h more than 30% and 90%, respectively. [ 26 ] The difference between such two systems was attributed to the hydrophobic and hydrophilic nature of PCL and PCL‐PEO fibers, respectively. In any case, the strength of the interaction between CAM and such polymers was significantly weaker than with PEDOT.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antiviral and antibacterial properties should be studied by using biorelevant pathogens and testing the killing efficiency under external light. The Kogermann research group has experiences in setting up new in vitro/ex vivo/in vivo test systems for the analysis of antipathogen electrospun nanomaterials [107–109] …”
Section: Challenges: From Materials Characterization To In Vitro and In Vivo Efficacy Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Kogermann research group has experiences in setting up new in vitro/ex vivo/in vivo test systems forthe analysisofantipathogen electrospun nanomaterials. [107][108][109] These methods can be used andm odificationsc an be performed to improve the models ystem'sb iorelevance. Ex vivo models are one step closer to the in vivo testing, giving already more biorelevant information about the properties of the nanomaterials.…”
Section: Challenges:from Materials Characterizationto In Vitro and In Vivo Efficacy Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these reasons, recently electrospinning technique was used in the treatment and prevention of biofilm-related infections, where the possibility to finely trigger the drug release may have a different impact on the bacterial/biofilm growth [ 39 , 40 , 41 ]. Biofilm is a complex multidimensional, self-sustained community of bacteria producing a matrix consisting of proteins, extracellular DNA, and polysaccharides, which are frequently associated with antibiotic resistance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%