“…Thus, this reaction was also incorporated in our modeling approach.The brief overview of PA 66 literature discussed above shows a very large set of by‐products and chemical reactions over the polyamidation course, not always chemically identified unequivocally due to inherent complexity and misleading application of experimental techniques. For example: (i) quantification techniques (such as mass spectrometry) that are not intrinsically identification techniques (such as NMR and IR) applied independently led different authors to attribute distinct species (cyclohexane, 1‐hexene, and CP) to the same spectral peaks; (ii) low‐selective methods may overestimate amine end groups in PA 66 medium, such as titration; and iii) the method of marking carbon isotopes has been rarely combined with NMR, with exception for Garbow et al Therefore, the set of chemical reactions selected to represent the PA 66 SSP process presented in the next section is strictly based on compounds, the formation of which is relatively well accepted, such as CP, CO 2 , NH 3 , H 2 O, and amine groups. Focussing on SSP experimental studies, provided by Soto‐Valdez and Gramshaw, Edel and Etienne, and Mackerron and Gordon, they exhibit relevant amounts of one or more of these compounds, as well as alkylated CP.…”