2004
DOI: 10.1080/09670870412331286058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring native non-target Lepidoptera for three years following a high dose and volume application ofBacillus thuringiensissubsp.kurstaki

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As is typically the case with baculoviruses of forest insects, however, Gypchek plays only a modest role in gypsy moth control, because production costs are lower for the insecticide “Btk”, a Lepidopteran-specific bacterial toxin. Because Btk targets effectively all Lepidoptera, however, concerns over its environmental costs have led to increasing public demand for Gypchek use (Boulton and Otvos 2004; Narciso 2014; Nolan 2015). Baculovirus spray products like Gypchek may therefore be used repeatedly in the future, which may alter insect outbreak cycles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As is typically the case with baculoviruses of forest insects, however, Gypchek plays only a modest role in gypsy moth control, because production costs are lower for the insecticide “Btk”, a Lepidopteran-specific bacterial toxin. Because Btk targets effectively all Lepidoptera, however, concerns over its environmental costs have led to increasing public demand for Gypchek use (Boulton and Otvos 2004; Narciso 2014; Nolan 2015). Baculovirus spray products like Gypchek may therefore be used repeatedly in the future, which may alter insect outbreak cycles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pathogens are applied in very large numbers with the expectation that they will not establish, and as far as we know they do not, also indicating that their environmental risk is low. Transient effects are possible as nontarget insects will be swamped with a density of pathogen that might well be above endemic levels in the environment, potentially endangering local populations of vulnerable species (e.g., Boulton and Otvos 2004 ); but as far as we are aware, there is no evidence that they become established in these species. There are also no reports of the entomopathogens that have been released as classical biological control agents causing any negative, long-term effects; however, post-release monitoring is rare ( Hajek et al 2007 ).…”
Section: The Impact Of Genotype × Environment Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In response, the British Columbia Ministry of Forests conducted an eradication campaign during the spring of 1999 that consisted of three aerial applications of Btk (Foray 48B®, Valent Biosciences, Libertyville, IL, USA) at 50 billion international units [BIU] in 4.0L/ha). Although Btk is an attractive alternative to broad‐spectrum synthetic insecticides, many lepidopterans are known to be physiologically susceptible to Btk formulations [8–11], and several field studies have demonstrated that aerial spraying of Btk is generally harmful to nontarget Lepidoptera in the short term [12–17]. Thus, concerns were raised by some scientists and some members of the general public that the 1999 gypsy moth eradication program on southern Vancouver Island would be harmful, at least in the short term, to susceptible native lepidopteran species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a separate study [19] found no evidence to suggest that the observed reduction of caterpillars in Garry oak habitat led to a subsequent decline of songbirds (tertiary consumers, such as Cooper's hawk, were not studied). Moreover, with short generation times and high fecundity and vagility, many lepidopteran species may recover relatively quickly through reproduction and/or immigration from adjacent unsprayed habitats [17,20–22]. Therefore, assessing recovery is a vital component of pesticide impact assessment, and it is the purpose of the present paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%