2018
DOI: 10.1002/jum.14596
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring Morphologic Changes in Male Rowers Using Limited Portable Echocardiography Performed by a Frontline Physician

Abstract: Athletes' hearts have been studied for adaptive changes in response to exercise. Physiologic changes are normal responses to intense athletic training regimens, whereas pathologic changes predispose athletes to sudden cardiac death. The two alterations overlap in clinical presentation. Research continues to investigate the upper limits of cardiac remodeling to aid clinical decision making. Studying normal changes that occur in response to exercise will advance physicians' understanding of physiologic responses… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…"Wearables" was the smallest single group with fou (14%) studies [20,25,28,37]. The final six (21%) unassigned studies [4,19,24,33,36,39] wer Of the 49 studies that remained, 1 study was excluded from the review due to issues with accessing the full manuscript, leaving 48 studies to be included for full-text readings and to form the dataset for this review. However, during the full-text readings, a further 20 studies were excluded: 16 were excluded as they were deemed to be not relevant to the review, and the other 4 were excluded due to concerns about their quality, i.e., being vague and having an unclear description of either their methodology or approach used to develop their models, how the evaluation criteria were presented, and why certain metrics were used over others.…”
Section: Study Subgroupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…"Wearables" was the smallest single group with fou (14%) studies [20,25,28,37]. The final six (21%) unassigned studies [4,19,24,33,36,39] wer Of the 49 studies that remained, 1 study was excluded from the review due to issues with accessing the full manuscript, leaving 48 studies to be included for full-text readings and to form the dataset for this review. However, during the full-text readings, a further 20 studies were excluded: 16 were excluded as they were deemed to be not relevant to the review, and the other 4 were excluded due to concerns about their quality, i.e., being vague and having an unclear description of either their methodology or approach used to develop their models, how the evaluation criteria were presented, and why certain metrics were used over others.…”
Section: Study Subgroupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, during the full-text readings, a further 20 studies were excluded: 16 were excluded as they were deemed to be not relevant to the review, and the other 4 were excluded due to concerns about their quality, i.e., being vague and having an unclear description of either their methodology or approach used to develop their models, how the evaluation criteria were presented, and why certain metrics were used over others. After all the exclusions had been applied, this left a final total of 28 studies that were considered for this review [4,.…”
Section: Study Subgroupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations