2005
DOI: 10.1080/10589750500206774
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring fatigue famage and crack healing by ultrasound wave velocity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the estimation of the modulus of elasticity in concrete and asphalt mixture is not normally recommended for two reasons: (1) the errors of the estimation of Poisson's ratio are not negligible; (2) Equation 2.3 is appropriate for homogeneous material only, leaving its validity for inhomogeneous material, such as concrete and asphalt mixture, questionable (Malhotra and Carino 2004). Other applications of the UPV test include characterizing the homogeneity of concrete, estimating the strength of concrete, and monitoring the top-down cracking (Khazanovich et al 2005), fatigue damage, and crack healing in asphalt pavements (Abo-Qudais and Suleiman 2005;. It should be noted that for field testing of in-service pavements, indirect configuration of sensors as shown in Figure 2.7(b) needs to be used, as only the top surface is accessible.…”
Section: Stress Wave Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the estimation of the modulus of elasticity in concrete and asphalt mixture is not normally recommended for two reasons: (1) the errors of the estimation of Poisson's ratio are not negligible; (2) Equation 2.3 is appropriate for homogeneous material only, leaving its validity for inhomogeneous material, such as concrete and asphalt mixture, questionable (Malhotra and Carino 2004). Other applications of the UPV test include characterizing the homogeneity of concrete, estimating the strength of concrete, and monitoring the top-down cracking (Khazanovich et al 2005), fatigue damage, and crack healing in asphalt pavements (Abo-Qudais and Suleiman 2005;. It should be noted that for field testing of in-service pavements, indirect configuration of sensors as shown in Figure 2.7(b) needs to be used, as only the top surface is accessible.…”
Section: Stress Wave Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Healing was observable from changes in the UPV measurements, although there was greater variation in healing for longer rest periods (i.e., 7 to 14 days). As the IDT setup induces permanent deformation during the test, IDT should be considered a cyclic compression test, not a fatigue test [11,15,16]. Houel and Arnaud (2009) used UPV measurements and tension-compression (T/C) tests at -10 and 10°C.…”
Section: Non-invasive Fatigue-healing Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ultrasonic pulse velocity can be used to predict crack healing non-destructively without specimen crushing. As explained by Abo-Qudais and Suleiman, [12], it is sensitive to healing and to the effects of aggregate gradation, and rest period length and temperature. The effect of mix parameters on the UPV test was investigated by Arabani et al, [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%