2011
DOI: 10.3724/sp.j.1246.2011.00071.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring earthquakes with gravity meters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Earthquakes introduce a whole range of different frequency accelerations (Kulhánek, 1990;Greco et al, 2008;Niebauer et al, 2011;Ghobadi-Far et al, 2019) which can influence both the accuracy of individual readings as well as the repeatability of measurement cycles. The effect of large earthquakes on microgravity measurements is strongly dependent on the magnitude and depth of the earthquake and distance of the recording instrument from the epicentre.…”
Section: Effects Of Earthquakes On Gravity Readingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Earthquakes introduce a whole range of different frequency accelerations (Kulhánek, 1990;Greco et al, 2008;Niebauer et al, 2011;Ghobadi-Far et al, 2019) which can influence both the accuracy of individual readings as well as the repeatability of measurement cycles. The effect of large earthquakes on microgravity measurements is strongly dependent on the magnitude and depth of the earthquake and distance of the recording instrument from the epicentre.…”
Section: Effects Of Earthquakes On Gravity Readingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, gravimeters are usually designed to filter this noise, either through sensor design or applied filters, and consequently, only specifically designed gravimeters can detect these waves easily (Niebauer et al, 2011). 3.…”
Section: Effects Of Earthquakes On Gravity Readingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the hourly iGrav data needed some editing during a few seismic sequences as the amplitude of the seismic signal exceeded its dynamic range (Figure 6b). This was not necessary for the gPhoneX#32 (Figure 6a), as it has a larger dynamic range, the seismic events are removed by the low-pass filtering (Niebauer et al, 2011).…”
Section: Data Pre-processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SG mampu merekam aktivitas kebumian lainnya, hingga kejadian seismik, baik yang mikroseismik maupun yang makroseismik (Lan et al 2011), (Shen at al. 2011), (Zhang, K and Ma 2014) dan respons yang diberikan alat gravimeter berkorelasi dengan hasil pencatatan saat terjadi gempa bumi (Niebauer et al 2011 (Baldi et al 1995), dinamika resonansi mantel bumi (Omerbashich 2007) efek hidrologi (Virtanen 2006) dan beberapa indikasi perubahan alam lainnya. Akan tetapi, untuk mendapatkan nilai gaya berat yang dipengaruhi oleh gempa bumi, hanya dilakukan koreksi pasang surutnya saja.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified