Abstract:A complementary cell analysis method has been developed to assess the dynamic interactions of tumor cells with resident tissue and immune cells using optical light scattering and impedance sensing to shed light on tumor cell behavior. The combination of electroanalytical and optical biosensing technologies integrated in a lab-on-a-chip allows for continuous, label-free, and noninvasive probing of dynamic cell-to-cell interactions between adherent and nonadherent cocultures, thus providing real-time insights in… Show more
“…[ 4 ] Consequently a variety of surface patterning strategies have been developed in recent years to control the spatial orientation of cells for anchorage-dependent cell cultures, including those that infl uence adhesion, migration, proliferation, cell shape, cell differentiation and distinct linage commitment. [ 5 ] A range of nano-and microfabrication techniques have also been used to generate micropatterned co-culture systems, which exploit the different cell adhesion characteristics of various substrates, including photolithography, soft lithography and printing.…”
The spatial arrangement of cells in their microenvironment is known to significantly influence cellular behavior, thus making the control of cellular organization an important parameter of in vitro co‐culture models. However, recent advances in micropatterning co‐culture methods within biochips do not address the simultaneous cultivation of anchorage‐dependent and non‐adherent cells. To address this methodological gap we combine S‐layer technology with microfluidics to pattern co‐cultures to study the cell‐to‐cell and cell‐to‐surface interactions under physiologically relevant conditions. We exploit the unique self‐assembly properties of SbpA and SbsB S‐layers to create an anisotropic protein nanobiointerface on‐chip with spatially‐defined cytophilic (adhesive) and cytophobic (repulsive) properties. While microfluidics control physical parameters such as shear force and flow velocities, our anisotropic protein nanobiointerface regulates the biological aspects of the co‐culture method including biocompatibility, biostability, and affinity to non‐adherent cells. The reliability and reproducibility of our microfluidic co‐culture strategy based on laminar flow patterned protein nanolayers is envisioned to advance in vitro models for biomedical research.
“…[ 4 ] Consequently a variety of surface patterning strategies have been developed in recent years to control the spatial orientation of cells for anchorage-dependent cell cultures, including those that infl uence adhesion, migration, proliferation, cell shape, cell differentiation and distinct linage commitment. [ 5 ] A range of nano-and microfabrication techniques have also been used to generate micropatterned co-culture systems, which exploit the different cell adhesion characteristics of various substrates, including photolithography, soft lithography and printing.…”
The spatial arrangement of cells in their microenvironment is known to significantly influence cellular behavior, thus making the control of cellular organization an important parameter of in vitro co‐culture models. However, recent advances in micropatterning co‐culture methods within biochips do not address the simultaneous cultivation of anchorage‐dependent and non‐adherent cells. To address this methodological gap we combine S‐layer technology with microfluidics to pattern co‐cultures to study the cell‐to‐cell and cell‐to‐surface interactions under physiologically relevant conditions. We exploit the unique self‐assembly properties of SbpA and SbsB S‐layers to create an anisotropic protein nanobiointerface on‐chip with spatially‐defined cytophilic (adhesive) and cytophobic (repulsive) properties. While microfluidics control physical parameters such as shear force and flow velocities, our anisotropic protein nanobiointerface regulates the biological aspects of the co‐culture method including biocompatibility, biostability, and affinity to non‐adherent cells. The reliability and reproducibility of our microfluidic co‐culture strategy based on laminar flow patterned protein nanolayers is envisioned to advance in vitro models for biomedical research.
“…Impedance measurements have been used in a number of different studies to determine morphological changes in real time;27 cisplatin-induced cell death;28 differentiation of 3T3 cells into adipocytes;29 effects of curcumin on physicochemical characterization and effects on MCF7 cancer cell proliferation;30 monitoring of dynamic interactions of tumor cells with tissues and immune cells on a lab-on-a-chip;31 cell senescence measurements of adipose tissue-derived stem cells;32 and real-time evaluation of nanoparticle-induced cytotoxic effects 33. By this method, Moodley et al34 conducted real-time profiling of NK cell killing of human astrocytes.…”
BackgroundDendritic cell (DC) therapy is a promising therapy for cancer-targeting treatments. Recently, DCs have been used for treatment of some cancers. We aimed to develop an in vitro assay to evaluate DC therapy in cancer treatment using a breast cancer model.MethodsDCs were induced from murine bone marrow mononuclear cells in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 medium supplemented with GM-CSF (20 ng/mL) and IL-4 (20 ng/mL). Immature DCs were primed with breast cancer stem cell (BCSC)-derived antigens. BCSCs were sorted from 4T1 cell lines based on aldehyde dehydrogenase expression. A mixture of DCs and cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) were used to evaluate the inhibitory effect of antigen-primed DCs on BCSCs. BCSC proliferation and doubling time were recorded based on impedance-based cell analysis using the xCELLigence system. The specification of inhibitory effects of DCs and CTLs was also evaluated using the same system.ResultsThe results showed that impedance-based analysis of BCSCs reflected cytotoxicity and inhibitory effects of DCs and CTLs at 72 hours. Differences in ratios of DC:CTL changed the cytotoxicity of DCs and CTLs.ConclusionThis study successfully used impedance-based cell analysis as a new in vitro assay to evaluate DC efficacy in cancer immunotherapy. We hope this technique will contribute to the development and improvement of immunotherapies in the near future.
“…Routinely used immunofluorescence end-point analysis can now be replaced by complementary continuous monitoring techniques that assess the dynamic responses of cell cultures (Charwat et al, 2014, Charwat et al, 2013b, Picher et al, 2013. Additionally, several portable and miniaturized biosensors have been integrated into microfluidic cell analysis systems to detect transient cell responses in rapidly changing biological systems.…”
Section: Sensing Strategies For Microfluidic Cell Analysis Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cellular impedance spectroscopy is considered a robust analysis technique Heer, 2009, Sun andMorgan, 2010) and a variety of successful applications have been reported, including the detection of drug and nanomaterial cytotoxicity , Xiao and Luong, 2003, Yeon and Park, 2005, cell spreading (Wegener et al, 2000), endothelial cell stimulation and tight junction formation (Wegener et al, 1999), as well as IgE-mediated mast cell activation (Abassi et al, 2004) and stem cell differentiation (Cho et al, 2009, Hildebrandt et al, 2010. Another research group has also recently combined impedance spectroscopy with light scattering measurements, which are two well-established but independently used label-free cell analysis techniques, for cell analysis (Charwat, Rothbauer, 2013b). This dualparameter cell analysis system detects light scattering from adherent cells providing information on cell numbers and intracellular granularity while simultaneously performing impedance spectroscopy to monitor cell adhesion and cell-to-cell as well as cell-to-surface interactions without interfering with the physiological behavior of the in vitro cell culture.…”
Section: Sensing Strategies For Microfluidic Cell Analysis Systemsmentioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.