Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry 2012
DOI: 10.5772/30573
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring DXA Measurement in Clinical Practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The evaluation of the precision error of any densitometric device is fundamental in the clinical practice to warrant that over a certain time-lapse, any detected skeletal change is due to a bone density variation and not to the instrument’s uncertainty nor the operator’s experience [ 31 ]. In clinical practice, a BMD change that overcomes the precision error of a given densitometer is attributed to a meaningful biologic variation, identified with the LSC value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaluation of the precision error of any densitometric device is fundamental in the clinical practice to warrant that over a certain time-lapse, any detected skeletal change is due to a bone density variation and not to the instrument’s uncertainty nor the operator’s experience [ 31 ]. In clinical practice, a BMD change that overcomes the precision error of a given densitometer is attributed to a meaningful biologic variation, identified with the LSC value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%