2019
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2019.1579943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring deforestation and forest degradation using multi-temporal fraction images derived from Landsat sensor data in the Brazilian Amazon

Abstract: Deforestation is the replacement of forest by other land use while degradation is a reduction of long-term canopy cover and/or forest stock. Forest degradation in the Brazilian Amazon is mainly due to selective logging of intact/un-managed forests and to uncontrolled fires. The deforestation contribution to carbon emission is already known but determining the contribution of forest degradation remains a challenge. Discrimination of logging from fires, both of which produce different levels of forest damage, is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
0
7

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
23
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is possible that the key to more accurately identify disturbed areas does not lie in the lack of "detectability" through the ∆rNBR index, but rather in the capacity to separate real forest disturbances from noise. Notwithstanding, the range of all accuracies found here are well within the range of previous works, or exceed them [30,31,34,38,50] [43,45,46,[74][75][76]. However, more information is needed regarding the differing capabilities of the two sensors for land cover mapping and the consequences of these differences in the context of forest cover monitoring and forest cover change assessment.…”
Section: Detection Of Logging Impacts: Comparison With Other Studies supporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, it is possible that the key to more accurately identify disturbed areas does not lie in the lack of "detectability" through the ∆rNBR index, but rather in the capacity to separate real forest disturbances from noise. Notwithstanding, the range of all accuracies found here are well within the range of previous works, or exceed them [30,31,34,38,50] [43,45,46,[74][75][76]. However, more information is needed regarding the differing capabilities of the two sensors for land cover mapping and the consequences of these differences in the context of forest cover monitoring and forest cover change assessment.…”
Section: Detection Of Logging Impacts: Comparison With Other Studies supporting
confidence: 79%
“…Landsat 8 data increased the estimated area of selective logging by 36.9%, compared to Sentinel-2 ( Table 3). Logging infrastructure, such as log landings and logging roads, are generally smaller than the Landsat spatial resolution [38]. In consequence, the possible area overestimation can be attributed to the high response values of mixed pixels in Landsat 8, that show up as a set of "pure" pixels in Sentinel-2, for the same corresponding area.…”
Section: Forest Area Affected By Selective Loggingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To create our ground truth masks, we used the Brazilian Institute of Space Research's Project for Deforestation Mapping (INPE's PRODES) data [7] for the years of 2018 and 2019 as a visual guide and then refined it by remapping the deforestation polygons on a smaller scale. PRODES data are commonly used for deforestation reports and studies have used it before when modeling and studying deforestation dynamics [85,86]. The changes were mapped using digitizing tools from the QGIS software [87] at 1:30,000 scale and subsequently transformed into binary raster files with 0 and 1 as absence-presence codes, respectively.…”
Section: Ground Truthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Além disso, as imagens fração podem ser usadas para mapear florestas degradadas devido às seguintes características: a) imagens fração vegetação destacam as condições da cobertura florestal e permitem diferenciar entre áreas florestais e não florestais da mesma maneira que os índices de vegetação existentes (como por exemplo, Índice de Vegetação de Diferença Normalizada -NDVI e Índice de Vegetação Melhorada -EVI); b) imagens fração sombra destacam áreas com baixos valores de reflexão, como água, sombra e áreas queimadas e, consequentemente, permitem identificar a degradação florestal causada por queimadas; e c) imagens fração solo destacam áreas com altos valores de reflexão, como solo exposto e, também, destacam áreas menores do que o tamanho do pixel (como por exemplo, pátio de estoque e carreadores de atividades de exploração seletiva de madeira), permitindo, consequentemente, identificar as áreas de floresta degradada causada pela exploração seletiva de madeira. Devido ao desafio de estabelecer um método operacional e eficiente para detecção e monitoramento da degradação florestal, muitos esforços têm sido relatados usando o Modelo Linear de Mistura Espectral para mapear o corte seletivo (ASNER et al, 2005; ANWAR e STEIN, 2012), áreas queimadas (QUINTANO et al, 2006;ANDERSON et al, 2005;SHIMABUKURO et al, 2009), degradação florestal (SOUZA et al, 2005, SHIMABUKURO et al 2019, mudanças na cobertura da floresta associadas ao desmatamento e degradação florestal (SOUZA et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified