2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2020.111873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring cropland abandonment with Landsat time series

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
77
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
77
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, it can be challenging to analyze recent abandonment from satellite data due to confusion among active fallow and noncropland classes, and the general difficulty of differentiating short-term idling of land from longer-term abandonment [33][34][35] . Despite these limitations, field-level expected accuracies for all cropland expansion and abandonment ranged from 71.0 to 86.9% for both the user's and producer's perspectives (Supplementary Table 8) and were consistent with targeted standards for measuring change 36,37 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it can be challenging to analyze recent abandonment from satellite data due to confusion among active fallow and noncropland classes, and the general difficulty of differentiating short-term idling of land from longer-term abandonment [33][34][35] . Despite these limitations, field-level expected accuracies for all cropland expansion and abandonment ranged from 71.0 to 86.9% for both the user's and producer's perspectives (Supplementary Table 8) and were consistent with targeted standards for measuring change 36,37 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, this framework can generate maps of CT before and after evolution occurs or over any specified time period. The trends of spectral index over time have provided insights into the change processes in various landscapes [59]- [64].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, precision, recall, and F1-score consider the total number of samples for each class separately. (18) where TP, TN, FP, and FN represent the true positive, true negative, false positive, and false negative predictions, respectively.…”
Section: Performance Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Yu et al [13] classified crops using a time-series VI trajectory via the curve-fitting method. Supervised algorithms, such as support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and neural networks (NNs), have shown superior capability in modelling high-degree nonlinear problems in land-use classification [14,15] and cropland abandonment detection [16][17][18]. Löw et al [17] used machine learning algorithms (SVM and RF) to successfully distinguish abandoned cropland from a cropland dataset.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation