2006
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0510657103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring chaperone engagement of substrates in the endoplasmic reticulum of live cells

Abstract: The folding environment in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) depends on multiple abundant chaperones that function together to accommodate a range of substrates. The ways in which substrate engagement shapes either specific chaperone dynamics or general ER attributes in vivo remain unknown. In this study, we have evaluated how changes in substrate flux through the ER influence the diffusion of both the lectin chaperone calreticulin and an inert reporter of ER crowdedness. During acute changes in substrate load, t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
116
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(57 reference statements)
6
116
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Failure of CDDP to induce CRT redistribution from the ER lumen to the cell surface To monitor the redistribution of CRT from the ER lumen to peripheral locations close to the plasma membrane, we generated U2OS cells that stably express a CRT-green fluorescent protein (GFP) fusion protein (Snapp et al, 2006). Control experiments revealed that this protein was located in the ER lumen, in which most of the endogenous CRT resides (not shown).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Failure of CDDP to induce CRT redistribution from the ER lumen to the cell surface To monitor the redistribution of CRT from the ER lumen to peripheral locations close to the plasma membrane, we generated U2OS cells that stably express a CRT-green fluorescent protein (GFP) fusion protein (Snapp et al, 2006). Control experiments revealed that this protein was located in the ER lumen, in which most of the endogenous CRT resides (not shown).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FL-DGAT2 and FL-⌬122-388 displayed a typical ER staining pattern and co-localized with the ER marker, ER-GFP (Fig. 3A) (30). When both transmembrane domains were deleted from DGAT2 (FL-⌬66 -115), DGAT2 was no longer in the ER and did not co-localize with ER-GFP (Fig.…”
Section: Dgat2 Is a Multimericmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…LULL1-mCherry was made by excising LULL1 from EGFP-N1 using HindIII and EcoRI restriction sites and ligating into pmCherry-N1 (Clontech, Mountain View, CA). ER-RFP was from (Snapp et al, 2006). Sun2-GFP was from Hodzic et al (2004).…”
Section: Plasmidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This, together with the fact that ⌬GAG-TorA (and in some cell types, also wild-type TorA) is known to be intrinsically enriched in the NE ( Figure 1A; Gonzalez-Alegre and Paulson, 2004; Goodchild and Dauer, 2004;Naismith et al, 2004), led us to hypothesize that distribution of TorA between ER and NE may normally be controlled by interaction with endogenous LULL1. To explore this possibility, we used RNA interference (RNAi) to deplete LULL1 ( Figure 5A) and compared the localization of ⌬GAG-TorA-mGFP to that of a cotransfected ER lumenal marker consisting of a prolactin signal sequence and a KDEL ER-retrieval sequence fused to mRFP (ER-RFP; Snapp et al, 2006). Representative confocal sections show that ⌬GAG-TorA-mGFP is more concentrated around the nucleus than is ER-RFP in U2OS cells ( Figure 5B), but not in LULL1 knockdown cells ( Figure 5C).…”
Section: Removing Lull1 Reduces Enrichment Of ⌬Gag-tora In the Nucleamentioning
confidence: 99%