2008
DOI: 10.5589/m08-066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring Canada’s forests. Part 1: Completion of the EOSD land cover project

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
151
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 211 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
151
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To characterize land cover at the study sites, 30 m resolution National Land Cover Database (NLCD) data were used for sites in the US, and Earth Observation for Sustainable Development of Forests (EOSD) data were used for sites in Canada (Table 1) (Vogelmann et al, 2001;Wulder et al, 2008). The MODIS Collection 5 Land Cover Type product classification at 500 m resolution was also used to characterize land cover .…”
Section: Study Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To characterize land cover at the study sites, 30 m resolution National Land Cover Database (NLCD) data were used for sites in the US, and Earth Observation for Sustainable Development of Forests (EOSD) data were used for sites in Canada (Table 1) (Vogelmann et al, 2001;Wulder et al, 2008). The MODIS Collection 5 Land Cover Type product classification at 500 m resolution was also used to characterize land cover .…”
Section: Study Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximately 65% of Canada is occupied by forest-dominated ecosystems [1], of which 350 million hectares are represented by trees and other wooded land [2], with the remainder dominated by lakes and wetlands. Knowledge on the extent, condition, and management of forest resources is critical to meet both national [3,4] and international [5] expectations of sustainable forest management and to support reporting requirements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although suitable for detection of large--area disturbances such as fire and large--scale clearcuts, coarse--resolution imagery is less capable of detecting forest management activities than finer--grained observations from satellites such as Landsat (Skole and Tucker, 1993; Tucker and 5 Townshend, 2000;Bucha & Stibig, 2008;Wulder et al, 2008;Potapov et al, 2009). Studies that use imagery of finer spatial grain have either mapped at too coarse a temporal grain to detect short--term changes in forest disturbance rate Hansen et al, 2010) The study reported here was derived from the first two phases of NAFD, which employed a geographic sample of Landsat observations at a relatively high temporal frequency (approximately annual time step) over a 20--year period to characterize the dynamics of recent US forest disturbance history.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%