“…Traditional methods to study biofilm growth suffered from some drawbacks. A few methods only measured total biomass increase (including EPS) with no way to distinguish between living and dead organic matter like quartz crystal microbalances (Tam et al, 2007), large area photometry (Bester et al, 2005;Milferstedt et al, 2006), electrical capacitance (Maurício et al, 2006), fiber optical devices (Tamachkiarow and Flemming, 2003), differential turbidity measurement devices (Klahre and Flemming, 2000), microfluidic biochips (Richter et al, 2007), optical coherence tomography (Haisch and Niessner, 2007), pressure drop or friction resistance (Lee et al, 1998), heat transfer resistance (Ludensky, 1998), nuclear magnetic resonance (Seymour et al, 2004), attenuated total reflectance-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (Delille et al, 2007), and photoacoustic spectroscopy (Schmid et al, 2004). Furthermore, some techniques are destructive for instance the physical removal of biofilm from coupons or fluorescent dyes used for microscopy that kill the cells.…”