Monitoring and Risk Assessment of Pesticide Residues in Commercial Environment-Friendly Agricultural Products Distributed Using LC-MS/MS in Seoul Metropolitan Area

김종율,; 정유민,; 오한슬,; 강성태,

doi:10.9721/kjfst.2015.47.3.306

Cited by 6 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Equation (1) Regression Coefficient 95% CI (2) for Regression Coefficient (3) (r 2 = 0.9768) 0.1891 0.1600-0.2182 0.1600 (1) Significant at 95% confidence level by the F-test. (2) Significant at 95% confidence level by the Ttest.…”

Section: Dissipation Regressionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…PHRL refers to the maximum allowable concentration of pesticides in the pre-harvest steps, by date (up to 10 days before shipment). Exceeding the PHRL during pre-harvest steps results in actions such as disposal, shipment delay, and purpose conversion [ 3 ]. The selection of crops and pesticides for PHRL setting reflects the standards as determined by the National Agricultural Products Quality Management Service.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparative Biological Half-Life of Penthiopyrad and Tebufenpyrad in Angelica Leaves and Establishment of Pre-Harvest Residue Limits (PHRLs)

Kim,

Lee,

Jeong

et al. 2024

Foods

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To prevent pesticides from exceeding maximum residue limits (MRLs) in crops during export and shipment, it is necessary to manage residue levels during the pre-harvest stages. Therefore, the Republic of Korea establishes pre-harvest residue limits (PHRLs) per crop and pesticide. This study was conducted to set PHRLs for penthiopyrad and tebufenpyrad in angelica leaves, where the exceedance rates of MRLs are expected to be high. The LOQ of the analytical method used was 0.01 mg/kg and it demonstrated good linearity, with a correlation coefficient of 0.999 or higher within the quantitation range of 0.005 to 0.5 mg/kg. The recovery and storage stability accuracy values were in the range of 94.5–111.1%, within the acceptable range (70–120%, RSD ≤ 20%). The matrix effect for both pesticides was in the medium-to-strong range, and it did not significantly impact the quantitative results as a matrix-matched calibration method was employed. Using the validated method, residue concentrations of penthiopyrad 20 (%) EC and tebufenpyrad 10 (%) EC were analyzed. Both pesticides exhibited a decreasing residue trend over time. In Fields 1–3 and their integrated results, the biological half-life was within 2.6–4.0 days for penthiopyrad and 3.0–4.2 days for tebufenpyrad. The minimum value of the regression coefficient in the dissipation curve regression equation was selected as the dissipation constant. The selected dissipation constants for penthiopyrad in Fields 1–3 and their integration were 0.1221, 0.2081, 0.2162, and 0.1960. For tebufenpyrad, the dissipation constants were 0.1451, 0.0960, 0.1725, and 0.1600, respectively. The dissipation constant was used to calculate PHRL per field. Following the principles of the PHRL proposal process, residue levels (%) on PHI dates relative to MRLs were calculated, and fields for proposing PHRLs were selected. For penthiopyrad, since the residue level (%) was less than 20%, the PHRL for Field 3 with the largest dissipation constant was proposed. For tebufenpyrad, as the residue level (%) exceeded 80%, the PHRL proposal could not established. It is deemed necessary to reassess the MRL and ‘guidelines for safe use’ for tebufenpyrad in angelica leaves.

show abstract

Section: Dissipation Regressionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%