2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring and predicting the fecal indicator bacteria concentrations from agricultural, mixed land use and urban stormwater runoff

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
41
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
5
41
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Rural or high density residential areas are reported to contribute 30-50 times greater E. coli levels in stormwater compared to light or sparsely populated residential area (McCarthy et al, 2006). Paule-Mercado et al (2016) investigated the variability of FIB concentrations in agricultural, mixed land use and urban catchments with variable catchment area, land use, and land cover. The urban site had the greatest level (E. coli 7.39 log 10 MPN/100 mL; fecal streptococci 7.21 log 10 CFU/ 100 mL) of FIB concentrations compared to agricultural site (E. coli 2.51 log 10 MPN/100 mL; fecal streptococci 2.48 log 10 CFU/100 mL) because of runoff from commercial markets and impervious cover, sewer and septic overflows.…”
Section: Fecal Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rural or high density residential areas are reported to contribute 30-50 times greater E. coli levels in stormwater compared to light or sparsely populated residential area (McCarthy et al, 2006). Paule-Mercado et al (2016) investigated the variability of FIB concentrations in agricultural, mixed land use and urban catchments with variable catchment area, land use, and land cover. The urban site had the greatest level (E. coli 7.39 log 10 MPN/100 mL; fecal streptococci 7.21 log 10 CFU/ 100 mL) of FIB concentrations compared to agricultural site (E. coli 2.51 log 10 MPN/100 mL; fecal streptococci 2.48 log 10 CFU/100 mL) because of runoff from commercial markets and impervious cover, sewer and septic overflows.…”
Section: Fecal Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have documented the impacts of urban run‐off on stream water quality. Regional case studies highlight increased loading to receiving streams of pollutants such as nutrients (Newcomer Johnson, Kaushal, Mayer, Smith, & Sivirichi, ), suspended solids (MacAvoy, Plank, Mucha, & Williamson, ), oil and grease (Sood, Sood, Bansal, & John, ), faecal coliform bacteria (Paule‐Mercado et al, ), trace metals (Ruchter & Sures, ), thermal energy (Sun, Yearsley, Voisin, & Lettenmaier, ), and salts (Corsi, De Cicco, Lutz, & Hirsch, ). These studies indicate elevated but highly variable concentrations of solutes in streams with several constituents surpassing public health standards, stressing aquatic biota, and potentially impairing any beneficial use of water resources in these landscapes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Galdino Pereira et al (41) also reported a possible association between conductivity and FIB in surface water in Brazil and concluded that the higher value of conductivity, indicating large amounts of ions, was associated with organic matter decomposition (rho ϭ 0.42; P Ͻ 0.05). The significant positive correlation between TDS and traditional fecal indicators could be due to the fact that TDS provides the suitable medium for microbial fecal indicators to grow, carrying supportive nutrients (27,42). A previous study conducted by Lian et al in tropical surface waters in Singapore in 2015 showed that there was no significant correlation between microbial fecal indicators, conductivity, and salinity (6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For example, the occurrence of human viruses showed a distinct pattern determined by land cover for studies conducted in the Milwaukee River watershed, Michigan River, coastal rivers of southern California, and the Great Lakes (23)(24)(25)(26). Paule-Mercado et al (27) revealed that land use and anthropogenic activities influenced intraevent variability of FIB through multiple linear regression (MLR) models in different monitoring sites. However, the studies failed to quantify the land use categories into predictive variables to assess the relationship between indicators and land use (27,28).…”
Section: Importancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation