Monitoring and evaluating the implementation of essential packages of health services

Abstract

Essential packages of health services (EPHS) are a critical tool for achieving universal health coverage, especially in low-income and lower middle-income countries. However, there is a lack of guidance and standards for monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of EPHS implementation. This paper is the final in a series of papers reviewing experiences using evidence from the Disease Control Priorities, third edition publications in EPHS reforms in seven countries. We assess current approaches to EPHS M&E, including case studies of M&E approaches in Ethiopia and Pakistan. We propose a step-by-step process for developing a national EPHS M&E framework. Such a framework would start with a theory of change that links to the specific health system reforms the EPHS is trying to accomplish, including explicit statements about the ‘what’ and ‘for whom’ of M&E efforts. Monitoring frameworks need to consider the additional demands that could be placed on weak and already overstretched data systems, and they must ensure that processes are put in place to act quickly on emergent implementation challenges. Evaluation frameworks could learn from the field of implementation science; for example, by adapting the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance framework to policy implementation. While each country will need to develop its own locally relevant M&E indicators, we encourage all countries to include a set of core indicators that are aligned with the Sustainable Development Goal 3 targets and indicators. Our paper concludes with a call to reprioritise M&E more generally and to use the EPHS process as an opportunity for strengthening national health information systems. We call for an international learning network on EPHS M&E to generate new evidence and exchange best practices.

An improved multi-attribute group decision-making method for selecting the green supplier of community elderly healthcare service

“…In previous research, relevant evaluation attributes were primarily concerned with service issues such as service cost, service quality, service ability, and service stability (Hamdan and Cheaitou, 2017;Konys, 2019;Danforth et al, 2023). The simplicity of attribute design may lead to inaccurate evaluation results.…”

Effectiveness of hospital-to-home transitional care interventions and consultation for implementation in Sudan: a scoping review of systematic reviews

“…Monitoring and evaluation of these interventions could be added as routine activities with existing staff. The main concern is that these interventions will face constraints when performed in a lowincome country, e.g., technical, behavioral, and organizational/ environmental challenges (52,53).…”

Third party monitoring for health in Afghanistan: the good, the bad and the ugly

“…With essential packages increasingly promoted as a means to achieve universal health coverage 12 (and implementation contracted-out in fragile and conflict affected settings 13 14 ) development practice 15 calls for specific attention to their monitoring processes. This is especially important for TPM mechanisms since they operate at the junction of various power structures.…”