2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring and controlling ovarian activities in wild ungulates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These issues have led to the development of non-invasive techniques to study reproductive processes using fecal samples. This methodology has gained considerable importance due to the ease of sample collection and analysis [ 18 , 20 - 22 , 24 ]. Although sedatives and tranquilizers are indicated for restraint in free-ranging and intractable animals, chemical restraint methods are known to pose significant health risks and could alter plasma progesterone concentrations [ 25 - 27 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These issues have led to the development of non-invasive techniques to study reproductive processes using fecal samples. This methodology has gained considerable importance due to the ease of sample collection and analysis [ 18 , 20 - 22 , 24 ]. Although sedatives and tranquilizers are indicated for restraint in free-ranging and intractable animals, chemical restraint methods are known to pose significant health risks and could alter plasma progesterone concentrations [ 25 - 27 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Milk samples are usually obtained from lactating animals while urine samples will require the fixing of catheters and some animal restraint. Fecal samples, however, can be collected at any time with ease and without any stress or restraint [ 23 , 24 , 30 , 31 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This results in individuals that consistently have higher (or lower) infection intensities relative to other individuals 70,71 . Perhaps supporting a hypothesis of delayed conception, the reduced fetal size in ewes with high parasite intensity may be a consequence of parasite-induced energetic constraints and consequent later conception dates resulting in shorter development time for the fetuses of these highly parasitized mothers 25,72,73 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Ultrasound technology had been used as a non‐invasive approach to investigate the reproductive organ structures of living animals such as the Indonesian thin‐tailed sheeps (Ulum, Paramitha, Muttaqin, Utami, & Utami, 2013), domestic cats (Ulum et al., 2017), dogs (Davidson & Baker, 2009a) and the bottlenose dolphins (Brook, 2001). Ultrasound technology has been extensively used for monitoring ovarian activity in wild animal ungulates (Sontakke, 2017), wild cats (Malandain et al., 2011; Pelican, Wildt, Pukazhenthi, & Howard, 2006), ostriches (Pandian, Selvan, Rajini, Parthiban, & Karthickeyan, 2016); livestock such as camels (Kelanemer et al., 2015), buffalo (Gad, Mohamed, El‐Azab, Sosa, & Essawy, 2017), cattles (Scully et al., 2015), sheep/goats (Khan et al., 2016) and pigs (Da Silva, Laurenssen, Knol, Kemp, & Soede, 2017); pet animals such as dogs and cats (Davidson & Baker, 2009b); and animal models such as rabbits (El‐Gayar et al., 2014) and mice (Benevenuto et al., 2017). Ultrasound technology can be applied to analyse the anatomical structures of non‐living specimens as well such as human cadaveric skeletons without damaging tissues or organs (Karmakar et al., 2012), the lumbosacral cavity and the dorsal atlantoaxial ligaments of dog cadavers (Liotta et al., 2015; de Vicente & Hammond, 2017), and also to observe nerve blocks in camel head cadavers (El‐Shafaey, Hamed, Abdellatif, & Elfadl, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…dogs (Davidson & Baker, 2009a) and the bottlenose dolphins (Brook, 2001). Ultrasound technology has been extensively used for monitoring ovarian activity in wild animal ungulates (Sontakke, 2017), wild cats (Malandain et al, 2011;Pelican, Wildt, Pukazhenthi, & Howard, 2006), ostriches (Pandian, Selvan, Rajini, Parthiban, & Karthickeyan, 2016); livestock such as camels (Kelanemer et al, 2015), buffalo (Gad, Mohamed, El-Azab, Sosa, & Essawy, 2017), cattles (Scully et al, 2015), sheep/goats (Khan et al, 2016) and pigs (Da Silva, Laurenssen, Knol, Kemp, & Soede, 2017); pet animals such as dogs and cats (Davidson & Baker, 2009b); and animal models such as rabbits (El-Gayar et al, 2014) and mice (Benevenuto et al, 2017). there is no blood flow resulting in an image that looks more hyperechoic compared to those of living animal tissue (Dmitri, Lerman, & Halaszynski, 2011;Karmakar, 2017;Mattoon & Nyland, 2014).…”
Section: Sonograms and Photographs Of The Uterusmentioning
confidence: 99%