2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2005.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring and control of biological nutrient removal in a Sequencing Batch Reactor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
54
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(19 reference statements)
2
54
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The samples were carried to the laboratory in storage boxes, which comply with the Standard Methods [15] and appropriate conservation criteria (cooler storage boxes, acidification, etc.) [16].…”
Section: Sample Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The samples were carried to the laboratory in storage boxes, which comply with the Standard Methods [15] and appropriate conservation criteria (cooler storage boxes, acidification, etc.) [16].…”
Section: Sample Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This behavior evidenced that denitrification had occurred. Besides, Akin and Ugurlu [10] indicated that the mobility of the N-NO x -depends on the ORP during the anoxic phase, therefore, the breaking point in the ORP profile ("nitrate knee") corresponded to the lowest concentration of N-NO x -(14.5 mg·L -1 ). At the same time, the end of the denitrification process was also related with an inflexion in pH profile (Figure 6(b)).…”
Section: Ph Orp and Do Profiles And Their Relation With Biological Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These can be used to identify specific control points during the SBR cycle. Therefore, the inflexion in pH, DO and ORP profiles can be used as on-line monitoring and control parameters for biological nutrient removal processes [8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the SBR system, external clarifiers and flow equalization tanks may not be essential and thus, offer low cost of facilities and operation management than those of conventional systems like activated sludge process [3]. SBR systems, applied to nitrification and denitrification, offer various advantages including: minimal space requirements, ease of management and possibility of modifications during trial phases through on-line control of the treatment strategy [4]. The improved regulations over nutrient discharge limits to natural water systems drive for the need in design improvements in SBR system to achieve thorough nitrification, denitrification along with COD removal and phosphate removal [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tsuneda et al proposed an anaerobic/aerobic/anoxic (AOA) process using a SBR for simultaneous phosphorus and nitrogen removal from wastewater with high efficiencies [3]. The objective of study conducted by Akin and Ugurlu was to establish control strategies for biological phosphorus and nitrogen removal using oxidation reduction potential (ORP), dissolved oxygen (DO) and pH profiles [4]. Kargi and Uygur studied nutrient removal from synthetic wastewater by sequencing batch operation at different SRTs varied from 5 and 30 days at six different levels with a overall cycle time of 10.5 hours obtained high CNP (carbon, nitrogen and phosphate) removal [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%