2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2008.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring and assessment of radionuclide discharges from Temelín Nuclear Power Plant into the Vltava River (Czech Republic)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(3 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This increase in T eff (like at USEK) has also been observed in Belarus, Ukraine, and Finland (Hanslik et al 2009a).…”
Section: The Effective Ecological Half-lifesupporting
confidence: 74%
“…This increase in T eff (like at USEK) has also been observed in Belarus, Ukraine, and Finland (Hanslik et al 2009a).…”
Section: The Effective Ecological Half-lifesupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Low energy soft β -irradiation has not been considered as harmful irradiation causing death or significant irreversible changes of organisms. Activities of the tritiated water used in our experiments are similar to surface waters in close proximity to nuclear power plants (NPP) in the Czech Republic (~10 -500 Bq.l -1 , data from website Monitoring of Radiation Situation, Czech Office for Nuclear Safety) and in freshwater in rivers downstream of NPP (HanSlík et al 2009). These levels of radiation have not been believed harmful for organisms living in such environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Large amounts of tritium may be released into the environment from nuclear power plants (Fiévet et al 2013). In the Czech Republic, the Temelín nuclear power plant discharged nearly 30 Tbq of tritium in 2005(HanSlík et al 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. The impact of radioactivity released by the nuclear power plant is negligible, with the exception of tritium, as we described elsewhere (Hanslík et al 2009(Hanslík et al , 2010. Because the power plant's contribution to the total amounts of 137 Cs and 90 Sr in the recipient is so low that it is covered with the old contamination, the monitoring of the power plant impact on the hydrosphere demands a precise determination of the radionuclide background.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Nowadays, mainly tritium ( 3 H), strontium 90 ( 90 Sr) and caesium 137 ( 137 Cs) are found in samples of surface water and other components of the hydrosphere, not only in the vicinity of the destroyed Chernobyl power plant (Bondar et al 2015) but also at more remote locations. However, these radionuclides have been observed to decrease continuously since they were introduced into the environment (Hanslík et al 2009;Hanslík and Ivanovová 2010;Smith and Beresford 2005;Vakulovsky et al 1994;Zibold et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%