Monitoring algorithm of two-factor authentication method based on рasswindow system

Abstract

Кандидат технических наук, доцент Кафедра информационных систем Харьковский национальный экономический университет им. С. Кузнеца пр. Ленина,

Development of methodology for modeling the interaction of antagonistic agents in cybersecurity systems

“…In [2], it is shown that network simulations for effective use should include highly accurate models of users, intruders and/or defenders. Simulations can be used to implement scripts for learning war games with realistic traffic and usergenerated vulnerabilities.…”

The development of the method of multifactor authentication based on hybrid crypto­code constructions on defective codes

“…A special place among the mechanisms of EA is occupied by two-factor authentication methods based on various smart cards, USB keys, OTP passwords [9,10,[12][13][14]. Multi-factor authentication methods have become widespread among hi-tech organizations, financial and insurance sectors of the market, large banking institutions, and public sector enterprises.…”

“…However, the studies of this method and the proposed monitoring algorithm [12] allow hacking the Passwindows system in 3-5 sessions by forming a bar code of the u card of the user of banking services. Fig.…”

Development of a modified UMAC algorithm based on crypto­code constructions

“…These changes contribute to the development of the digital economy, and in particular, electronic banking [1,2]. However, this is accompanied by an increase in the number and diversity of cyber threats.…”

“…third criterion). Thus, as statistical indicators for assessing collision properties, use[54]:-mathematical expectations m(n 1 ), m(n 2 ) and m(n 3 ) of maxima of the number of hashing rules (MAC formation rules) at which equalities (1),(2) and(3)are satisfied, respectively; -dispersion D(n 1 ), D(n 2 ) and D(n 3 ), characterizing the dispersion of the values of the number of hashing rules (MAC formation rules), at which equalities (1),(2) and(3)are satisfied, with respect to their mathematical expectations m(n 1 ), m(n 2 ) and m(n 3 ), respectively.…”