2010
DOI: 10.1002/etc.281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring acute and chronic water column toxicity in the Northern Sacramento–San Joaquin Estuary, California, USA, using the euryhaline amphipod, Hyalella azteca: 2006 to 2007

Abstract: After the significant population decline of several pelagic fish species in the Northern Sacramento-San Joaquin (SSJ) Estuary (CA, USA) in 2002, a study was performed to monitor water column toxicity using the amphipod Hyalella azteca. From January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2007, water samples were collected biweekly from 15 to 16 sites located in large delta channels and main-stem rivers, selected based on prevalent distribution patterns of fish species of concern. Ten-day laboratory tests with H. azteca surviv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(38 reference statements)
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For H. azteca, both sublethal endpoints were effective to detect low-level pesticide concentrations. The concentrations causing significant effects on all three endpoints in both species are within the range of environmentally relevant concentrations as reported in previous monitoring studies in different states of the USA (Anderson et al 2006;Phillips et al 2012;Smith and Lizotte 2007;Werner et al 2010). For example, studies in Californian creeks by Budd et al (2009) and Weston and Lydy (2012) NOEC no observed effective concentration, LC50 lethal concentration resulting in 50 % mortality of the population, EC50 effect concentration resulting in 50 % reduction in growth, SE standard error, C.I.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…For H. azteca, both sublethal endpoints were effective to detect low-level pesticide concentrations. The concentrations causing significant effects on all three endpoints in both species are within the range of environmentally relevant concentrations as reported in previous monitoring studies in different states of the USA (Anderson et al 2006;Phillips et al 2012;Smith and Lizotte 2007;Werner et al 2010). For example, studies in Californian creeks by Budd et al (2009) and Weston and Lydy (2012) NOEC no observed effective concentration, LC50 lethal concentration resulting in 50 % mortality of the population, EC50 effect concentration resulting in 50 % reduction in growth, SE standard error, C.I.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…For example, Deanovic et al compared the sensitivity and effectiveness of a chronic 10‐d H. azteca water‐column test with the standard 7‐d C. dubia test endpoints, and concluded that the H. azteca test detected pyrethroid presence far more effectively than the C. dubia test. As an additional advantage, H. azteca can be employed in tests for water quality monitoring in both fresh and brackish water bodies . Whereas it is being used as a model species in standard sediment and acute water‐column toxicity testing , few monitoring programs use chronic H. azteca water‐column tests for monitoring .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The copper threshold established for enclosed bays and estuaries is 4.8 μg L -1 . Dissolved copper concentrations up to 4.64 and 4.93 μg L -1 were detected in freshwater water samples from Cache-Lindsey Slough and Rough and Ready Island, respectively, and elevated dissolved copper concentrations of 37.2 and 58.9 μg L -1 have also been detected at Suisun Bay and Carquinez Strait, respectively (Werner et al 2010a). A recent study indicated that although the effect of copper on salmon olfaction is reduced in brackish and saline waters, copper can still cause avoidance behavior at environmentally relevant concentrations.…”
Section: Evidence Of Contaminants Detected In Fish Habitats At Levelsmentioning
confidence: 98%