2018
DOI: 10.1051/epjpv/2018005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring a photovoltaic system during the partial solar eclipse of August 2017

Abstract: Abstract. The power output of a 4.85 kW residential photovoltaic (PV) system located in Rochester, NY is monitored during the partial solar eclipse of August 21, 2017. The data is compared with the data on a day before and on the same day, a year ago. The area of exposed solar disk is measured using astrophotography every 16 s of the eclipse. Global solar irradiance is estimated using the eclipse shading, time of the day, location coordinates, atmospheric conditions and panel orientation. A sharp decline, as e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this event, the solar disc was 68% covered and the maximum registered decrease in electric production was 69% with respect to no eclipse conditions. A similar finding was presented by Kurinec et al [16] for a partial solar eclipse in Rochester, the United States, in 2017, in which, for a 70% partial eclipse, a maximum drop of 80% in energy production was measured; however, in this instance, a clouded sky also contributed to this decrease.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this event, the solar disc was 68% covered and the maximum registered decrease in electric production was 69% with respect to no eclipse conditions. A similar finding was presented by Kurinec et al [16] for a partial solar eclipse in Rochester, the United States, in 2017, in which, for a 70% partial eclipse, a maximum drop of 80% in energy production was measured; however, in this instance, a clouded sky also contributed to this decrease.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Across this wide area, both total and partial eclipses will occur, for which the model ought to be independent of the type of eclipse and the specific geometric dynamics between the Sun's and Moon's disk as viewed from different locations. From [11], it can be seen that the eclipse occultation dynamics follow a Gaussian profile that is truncated in the case of a total solar eclipse, a fact also observed in [16]. Considering that some models, such as [11], rely on assumptions regarding the motion of the Moon and Sun (i.e., linear trajectories), it is likely that, when implementing such models over wide geographical regions,…”
Section: Solar Disk Occultation Modelingmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Studies have been conducted to determine the overall behaviour of PV systems during an eclipse. A study monitored the performance of a 4.85 kW PV system during the 21 August 2017 eclipse and estimated the performance measurements using irradiance calculation approaches [12]. However, it does not quantify the performance of the system using one of the standard accepted metrics such as performance ratio (PR), energy performance index, or PPI as recognised by the industry [13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of the eclipse on the switching of the capacitor banks can also be quantified within the period of interest. Capacitor bank switching constraints and reactive power injection is as given in (12) and (13), respectively [49,50] (13) where N Daily Cap Switching is the total number of switching steps by the switched capacitor in a day, N Cap Switching, t is the number of switching operations at a time interval t, N Cap Switching max is the maximum total number of capacitor switching operations per day, Q cb max n is the maximum allowable reactive power injection by a capacitor bank and Q cb n is the actual reactive power injection by the capacitor bank.…”
Section: Voltage Device Operation Analysis At the Feedersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent work examines the different performance indicators of PV systems [7]. A study monitored the performance of a 4.85 kW PV system during 21 August 2017 eclipse and estimated the performance measurements using irradiance calculation approaches [19]. However, it does not quantify the performance of the system using one of the standard accepted metrics such as PR that is recognised and/or applied by the industry [20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%