2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2014.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Money for nothing: Estimating the impact of student aid on participation in higher education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
48
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…7 To help cover living expenses while enrolled, low-income students could apply to the government for maintenance grants, and all students could obtain small government maintenance loans to be repaid via mortgage-style payment plans after graduation (Dearden et al, 2014).…”
Section: Challenges During England's Free College Eramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 To help cover living expenses while enrolled, low-income students could apply to the government for maintenance grants, and all students could obtain small government maintenance loans to be repaid via mortgage-style payment plans after graduation (Dearden et al, 2014).…”
Section: Challenges During England's Free College Eramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies from the UK and Europe are rarer, perhaps due to the lack of clean policy "experiments" and data. Nevertheless, Dearden et al [15], and Nielsen et al [16] again find positive effects of aid on enrolment. Also of relevance to this paper are studies that look at the impact of aid on college attainment, rather than college enrolment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In the developed countries such as the UK, much of the funding recent debate in higher education has been both about value for money and about widening participation. This debate has been triggered by the severe cuts into university funding in the last few years, with many courses no longer receiving government subsidy and students required to make large contribution to their education by way of tuition fees of £9000 per year which the government contends is value for money and widens participation while critics disagree (Dearden et al 2014). In the low-income countries, notably sub-Saharan Africa, it is far much more than value for money.…”
Section: State Versus the Marketmentioning
confidence: 99%