1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4679(199802)54:2<211::aid-jclp10>3.0.co;2-m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Money as a tool to extinguish conditioned responses to cocaine in addicts

Abstract: Classical conditioning principles offer a nondrug way to treat cocaine dependence. Eleven male subjects with the primary diagnosis of cocaine dependence were placed into one of two groups. The experimental group was asked to handle $500 cash in a mock budgetary task. The control group was asked to just imagine handling and budgeting the money. The subjects rated their craving-related feelings before and after each task. The experimental group showed significantly more craving after the money-handling task as c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A few studies have used contingency management for those with dual psychiatric and substance use disorders to reduce use of money to purchase drugs or alcohol (Bellack, Bennett, Gearon, Brown, & Yang, 2006; Drebing et al, 2005; Hamilton et al, 1998; Ries et al, 2004). However, the idea of distributing money only after one has taken medication is not without criticism (Claassen, Fakhoury, Ford, & Priebe, 2007; Szmukler, 2009), with some studies showing the potential for financial coercion when such money is used to leverage adherence among people with psychiatric disabilities (Elbogen et al, 2003).…”
Section: Money Management and Psychiatric Disabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few studies have used contingency management for those with dual psychiatric and substance use disorders to reduce use of money to purchase drugs or alcohol (Bellack, Bennett, Gearon, Brown, & Yang, 2006; Drebing et al, 2005; Hamilton et al, 1998; Ries et al, 2004). However, the idea of distributing money only after one has taken medication is not without criticism (Claassen, Fakhoury, Ford, & Priebe, 2007; Szmukler, 2009), with some studies showing the potential for financial coercion when such money is used to leverage adherence among people with psychiatric disabilities (Elbogen et al, 2003).…”
Section: Money Management and Psychiatric Disabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anecdotally, some drug users report that cash is a cue to use. These reports are supported by empirical studies showing that cues associated with drug use, including cash, increase craving (Childress et al, 1993(Childress et al, , 1999Garavan et al, 2000;Hamilton et al, 1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…These results should also reassure treatment providers considering the use of incentives for decreasing a single drug in polydrug users, because receipt of incentives when positive for nontarget drug(s) could inadvertently reinforce their use. As noted in the introduction, it is possible for cash to serve as a drug use cue (e.g., Hamilton et al, 1998), and one cannot simply avoid the issue by requiring abstinence from all drugs. Several recent studies have shown that making delivery of incentives contingent on urine specimens testing negative from all or multiple drugs is not effective in helping patients achieve abstinence (Downey, Helmus, & Schuster, 2000; Schottenfeld, Pantalon, Chawarski, & Pakes, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%