2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.eeh.2011.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monetization and growth in colonial New England, 1703–1749

Abstract: The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peerreviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 See Goldberg (2009); Grubb (2003Grubb ( , 2004Grubb ( , 2010Grubb ( , 2012; Hanson (1979); McCallum (1992); Michener (1987Michener ( , 1988; Wright (2005, 2006); Officer (2005); Perkins (1988, pp. 163-86); Rousseau (2006Rousseau ( , 2007; Rousseau and Stroup (2011); Smith (1985aSmith ( , 1985b; Sumner (1993); West (1978); Wicker (1985). The classical quantity theory of money, at least a prominent version, takes the equation-of-exchange identity, MV = PY, as expressed in growth rates, ln(M) + ln(V) = ln(P) + ln(Y), and by assuming that ln(V) and ln(Y) are long-run constants transforms it into the quantity "theory" of money [ln(P) = some constant + ln(M)]; where M = the money supply, V = the velocity of that money's circulation, P = prices in that money, and Y = traded real output (Bordo 1987;Fisher 1912).…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 See Goldberg (2009); Grubb (2003Grubb ( , 2004Grubb ( , 2010Grubb ( , 2012; Hanson (1979); McCallum (1992); Michener (1987Michener ( , 1988; Wright (2005, 2006); Officer (2005); Perkins (1988, pp. 163-86); Rousseau (2006Rousseau ( , 2007; Rousseau and Stroup (2011); Smith (1985aSmith ( , 1985b; Sumner (1993); West (1978); Wicker (1985). The classical quantity theory of money, at least a prominent version, takes the equation-of-exchange identity, MV = PY, as expressed in growth rates, ln(M) + ln(V) = ln(P) + ln(Y), and by assuming that ln(V) and ln(Y) are long-run constants transforms it into the quantity "theory" of money [ln(P) = some constant + ln(M)]; where M = the money supply, V = the velocity of that money's circulation, P = prices in that money, and Y = traded real output (Bordo 1987;Fisher 1912).…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While no method is without its weaknesses, the SVAR model approach is the most commonly used with extensive applications in in economic history (see for example, Perry & Vernengo, 2013;Rousseau & Stroup, 2011;Sabaté, Gadea, & Escario, 2006;Shibamoto & Shizume, 2014), economics (see for example, Auerbach & Gorodnichenko, 2012;Bakaert, Hoerova, & Duca, 2013;Cheng & Yang, 2020;Christiano et al, 1999), and among policy organisations such as OECD and central banks (see for example Jensen & Pedersen, 2019;Kim, 2017;Villani & Varne, 2003). The use of the high-frequency method is of course limited in economic history where the access to minuteby-minute trading data is rare.…”
Section: Econometric Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, see Grubb (2004Grubb ( , 2006aGrubb ( , 2006b; Hanson (1979);McCallum (1992); Michener (1987Michener ( , 1988; Michener andWright (2006a, 2006b); Officer (2005);Perkins (1988, 163-86); Rousseau and Stroup (2011);Smith (1985aSmith ( , 1985bSmith ( , 1988; Sumner (1993); Weiss (1970); West (1978); .…”
Section: Acknowledgmentsmentioning
confidence: 98%