2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-33-6746-3_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monetary Transmission Mechanism in Rwanda

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is confirmed by Tai et al (2012) who find that the rate of transmission from money market rates to deposit and lending rates was moderate and sluggish across economies in Asia. A similar conclusion is reached by Dube and Zhou (2014) for the case of South Africa, Kigabo and Mwenese (2016) and Davoodi et al (2013) for East Africa as a region, Ngoma and Chanda (2022) for the case of Zambia, Sande and Apaa Okello (2013) for Uganda, Misati et al (2011) for Kenya, Kigabo (2018) for Rwanda as well as Mbowe (2015) and Bashagi et al (2019) the case of Tanzania. Indeed, several factors have been identified as contributing to the incomplete pass-through, including weak market structure, limited bank competition, limited financial development, and volatile exchange rate movements.…”
Section: Some Empirical Considerationssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…This is confirmed by Tai et al (2012) who find that the rate of transmission from money market rates to deposit and lending rates was moderate and sluggish across economies in Asia. A similar conclusion is reached by Dube and Zhou (2014) for the case of South Africa, Kigabo and Mwenese (2016) and Davoodi et al (2013) for East Africa as a region, Ngoma and Chanda (2022) for the case of Zambia, Sande and Apaa Okello (2013) for Uganda, Misati et al (2011) for Kenya, Kigabo (2018) for Rwanda as well as Mbowe (2015) and Bashagi et al (2019) the case of Tanzania. Indeed, several factors have been identified as contributing to the incomplete pass-through, including weak market structure, limited bank competition, limited financial development, and volatile exchange rate movements.…”
Section: Some Empirical Considerationssupporting
confidence: 58%