2022
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4014139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monetary Policy and Inequality: The Finnish Case

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the market-based framework may explain executive compensation developments in one country in one period, e.g., in Finland since the mid-1990s, as this paper found, or in the US after 1980 (Frydman and Saks 2010;Gabaix and Landier 2008), it cannot account for executive compensation developments across different contexts, where the relationship between executive compensation and firm size is likely to differ depending on the distribution of power in society. Further, previous research on increased income inequality in Finland has highlighted multiple causes, including increased capital incomes, reduced tax progressivity, reduced redistributive government spending, weakened unions, increased unemployment, increased firm profitability, and increased disparities in earned income (Mäki-Fränti et al 2022;Heino 2021;Riihelä et al 2010;Roikonen 2021;Riihelä and Tuomala 2020). Each of these changes is aligned with the pro-employer shift observed in the congruence analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the market-based framework may explain executive compensation developments in one country in one period, e.g., in Finland since the mid-1990s, as this paper found, or in the US after 1980 (Frydman and Saks 2010;Gabaix and Landier 2008), it cannot account for executive compensation developments across different contexts, where the relationship between executive compensation and firm size is likely to differ depending on the distribution of power in society. Further, previous research on increased income inequality in Finland has highlighted multiple causes, including increased capital incomes, reduced tax progressivity, reduced redistributive government spending, weakened unions, increased unemployment, increased firm profitability, and increased disparities in earned income (Mäki-Fränti et al 2022;Heino 2021;Riihelä et al 2010;Roikonen 2021;Riihelä and Tuomala 2020). Each of these changes is aligned with the pro-employer shift observed in the congruence analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, monetary policy can influence income disparity both directly via financial markets and indirectly via general equilibrium consequences, such as promoting economic activities and reducing unemployment and increasing wages. The total influence of monetary policy (MP) on income inequality is theoretically unclear (Mäki-Fränti et al , 2022). However, some researchers indicate that expansionary and contractionary monetary policy reduces/increases income inequality (Andersen et al , 2021; Taghizadeh‐Hesary et al , 2020; Siami‐Namini et al , 2020; Hohberger et al , 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%