2018
DOI: 10.1111/ecin.12741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monetary and Fiscal Policy Design at the Zero Lower Bound: Evidence From the Lab

Abstract: The global economic crisis of [2007][2008] has pushed many advanced economies into a liquidity trap. We design a laboratory experiment on the effectiveness of policy measures to avoid expectation-driven liquidity traps. Monetary policy alone is not sufficient to avoid liquidity traps, even if it preventively cuts the interest rate when inflation falls below a threshold. However, monetary policy augmented with a fiscal switching rule succeeds in escaping liquidity trap episodes. We measure the effect of fiscal … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By providing the theoretical conditions under which monetary policy effectively turns a context of strategic complements into a context of strategic substitutes, our results complement the conclusion reached by Hommes (2018, p. 84), according to which " [t]he laboratory macro experiments also suggest an immediate way to stabilize the economy: policy can stabilize the economy by adding negative feedback to the system, or equivalently, by weakening the positive feedback." Our results can also rationalize why monetary policy is found to be effective in a variety of monetary policy experiments, like Assenza et al (2013), Bao and Zong (2019), Pfajfar and Žakelj (2018), Hennequin and Hommes (2019), and Hommes et al (2019).…”
supporting
confidence: 72%
“…By providing the theoretical conditions under which monetary policy effectively turns a context of strategic complements into a context of strategic substitutes, our results complement the conclusion reached by Hommes (2018, p. 84), according to which " [t]he laboratory macro experiments also suggest an immediate way to stabilize the economy: policy can stabilize the economy by adding negative feedback to the system, or equivalently, by weakening the positive feedback." Our results can also rationalize why monetary policy is found to be effective in a variety of monetary policy experiments, like Assenza et al (2013), Bao and Zong (2019), Pfajfar and Žakelj (2018), Hennequin and Hommes (2019), and Hommes et al (2019).…”
supporting
confidence: 72%
“…This result is confirmed by Hommes et al (2015), who conduct a laboratory experiment, where, rather than making any assumptions on agent's expectations, they let expectations be formed by human subjects in the laboratory. Without fiscal intervention, deflationary spirals regularly occur in their experiment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Ahrens 2 The LtFE methodology originates with Marimon and Sunder (1993), who study price forecasting in an overlapping-generations experimental economy. Experiments studying inflation and output gap expectations in New Keynesian reduced form economies have been developed to study expectation formation and equilibria selection (Adam 2007); the effects of different monetary policy rules on expectation formation Zakelj 2014, 2016;Assenza et al 2019;Hommes et al 2019a); expectation formation at the zero lower bound (Arifovic and Petersen 2017;Hommes et al 2019b). Backward-looking, inattentive forecasting behavior frequently observed in laboratory experiments is also widely found in household and professional forecasts (Malmendier and Arifovic and Petersen (2017) to study the effects of one-period ahead inflation projections in the presence of both demand and supply shock in the normal times or at the zero lower bound.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%