2017
DOI: 10.1016/s0261-5614(17)30900-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MON-P187: Translation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) To the Thai Setting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
7
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
7
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Boxes 1-4 of the PG-SGA SF were all perceived as easy to complete by the patients, even though about two-thirds of the study population had a lower level of education (ie, primary or secondary education). The excellent results on perceived difficulty are in line with those found in the pilot testing of the Dutch (S-DI = 0.96), 21 Portuguese (S-DI = 0.94), 27 Thai (S-DI = 0.95), 28 and German language versions (S-DI = 0.91) 29 of the PG-SGA, demonstrating broad applicability and reproducibility across language versions. Our results on difficulty with completing the PG-SGA SF also appear to be in line with those reported on the self-completion of the MUST.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Boxes 1-4 of the PG-SGA SF were all perceived as easy to complete by the patients, even though about two-thirds of the study population had a lower level of education (ie, primary or secondary education). The excellent results on perceived difficulty are in line with those found in the pilot testing of the Dutch (S-DI = 0.96), 21 Portuguese (S-DI = 0.94), 27 Thai (S-DI = 0.95), 28 and German language versions (S-DI = 0.91) 29 of the PG-SGA, demonstrating broad applicability and reproducibility across language versions. Our results on difficulty with completing the PG-SGA SF also appear to be in line with those reported on the self-completion of the MUST.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Assessment of comprehensibility, difficulty, and content validity was performed using the methodology used in previous studies for the Dutch, Thai, German, and Norwegian versions of the PG-SGA [8,15,16,18]. Before calculating item and scale scores, we converted the four-point Likert scales to a dichotomous not present (0) and present (1), as in previous studies [8,15,16,18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Development of the Japanese version of the PG-SGA was performed according to the 10 steps of the ISPOR "Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-reported Outcome Measures" [14]. The specifics of the ISPOR process as applied to PG-SGA translations was described in a Dutch study [15], which served as the basis for the development of other language versions of the PG-SGA [15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was tested in cancer patients and healthcare professionals with the supervision of copyright holder and an international expert on translation and cultural adaptation of the PG-SGA. The results showed it has conceptual equivalence to the original English PG-SGA and considered easy to use and comprehensible by cancer patients and healthcare professionals (Nitichai et al, 2018). Utilization of this tool in each own country's language could better reflect nutrition status of cancer patients as well as promote meta-analysis and inter-country comparison of nutrition status in cancer patients since the Scored PG-SGA was translated and culturally adapted to several languages (Jager-Wittenaar and Ottery, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The nutritional status of all cancer patients was assessed using Thai PG-SGA (Nitichai et al, 2018) and SGA (Detsky et al 1987) by a trained dietitian experienced in using both tools. In the evaluation process, the trained dietitian applies strict criteria to the standard protocols and making measurements with great care in categorizing nutritional status by PG-SGA and SGA.…”
Section: Nutritional Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%