1983
DOI: 10.1016/0301-9322(83)90061-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Momentum transfer in a vertical down flow liquid jet ejector: case of self gas aspiration and emulsion flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since it is the suction chamber where the two streams of the primary and secondary fluid meet, its geometry is bound to Kroll (1947) --Well rounded 20--25 7 4--10 0.5--5 Davies et al (1967) 22.6--247 Well rounded --7 10 1.9 a Bhat et al (1972) 3.7--25.1 Conical 28 0 10 8.9 Cunningham and Dopkin (1974) 2.2--6.5 Well rounded --12.3--32.4 4.0 3.0 a Acharjee et al (1975) 5.4--50.4 Well rounded --8 10 2.0 a Biswas et al (1975) 1.4--12.8 Well rounded --6 7 1.9 a Zahradnik et al (1982) 33.8--113.8 Conical --0 6.4 -- Henzler (1983) 2.0--25.5 Well rounded --7.5 5 0.4--0.9 a Moresi et al (1983) 1.5--3.5 Conical 17.35 1.8 9.5 --Ben Ebrahim et al (1984) 4.0 Conical --3.5 2.0 -- Bhutada and Pangarkar (1987) 1.8--10.2 Conical or bell-shaped 12 0--16 5.0 3.0 a Mukherjee et al (1988) 1--50.6 Well rounded --10.8 7 -- Kundu et al (1994) 29.3--169.8 Conical --7 7 -- Kundu et al (1995) 29.3--169.8 Well rounded --9.7 7 -- Havelka et al (1997) 3.24 Conical --5--20 7 --Fernandez (2001) ------6 8 1.0 Cramers and Beenackers (2001) 2.1--9.0 Conical --2--10 3.0 -- Elgozali et al (2002) --Conical --10 7 2.72 Gamisans et al (2004) --Conical --0.5--1.3 ---- Rusly et al (2005) 2.5 Conical 10 5.0 7 5.0 Mandal et al (2005a) 10.0 Well rounded --9.7 9.1 -- Mandal et al (2005b) 5.6--14.4 Well rounded --9.7 9.1 -- Majumder et al (2005) 7.4--22.5 Well rounded --9.6 7 --Li and Christofides (2005) --Conical 12 1.1 2 2.17 Das and Biswas (2006) 15.5--59.5 ----7.76 8.6 -- Sriveerakul et al (2007) 5.6--10.0 Well rounded --1--6 10 1.1--6.8 a Indicate the optimum value suggested by the investigator.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Since it is the suction chamber where the two streams of the primary and secondary fluid meet, its geometry is bound to Kroll (1947) --Well rounded 20--25 7 4--10 0.5--5 Davies et al (1967) 22.6--247 Well rounded --7 10 1.9 a Bhat et al (1972) 3.7--25.1 Conical 28 0 10 8.9 Cunningham and Dopkin (1974) 2.2--6.5 Well rounded --12.3--32.4 4.0 3.0 a Acharjee et al (1975) 5.4--50.4 Well rounded --8 10 2.0 a Biswas et al (1975) 1.4--12.8 Well rounded --6 7 1.9 a Zahradnik et al (1982) 33.8--113.8 Conical --0 6.4 -- Henzler (1983) 2.0--25.5 Well rounded --7.5 5 0.4--0.9 a Moresi et al (1983) 1.5--3.5 Conical 17.35 1.8 9.5 --Ben Ebrahim et al (1984) 4.0 Conical --3.5 2.0 -- Bhutada and Pangarkar (1987) 1.8--10.2 Conical or bell-shaped 12 0--16 5.0 3.0 a Mukherjee et al (1988) 1--50.6 Well rounded --10.8 7 -- Kundu et al (1994) 29.3--169.8 Conical --7 7 -- Kundu et al (1995) 29.3--169.8 Well rounded --9.7 7 -- Havelka et al (1997) 3.24 Conical --5--20 7 --Fernandez (2001) ------6 8 1.0 Cramers and Beenackers (2001) 2.1--9.0 Conical --2--10 3.0 -- Elgozali et al (2002) --Conical --10 7 2.72 Gamisans et al (2004) --Conical --0.5--1.3 ---- Rusly et al (2005) 2.5 Conical 10 5.0 7 5.0 Mandal et al (2005a) 10.0 Well rounded --9.7 9.1 -- Mandal et al (2005b) 5.6--14.4 Well rounded --9.7 9.1 -- Majumder et al (2005) 7.4--22.5 Well rounded --9.6 7 --Li and Christofides (2005) --Conical 12 1.1 2 2.17 Das and Biswas (2006) 15.5--59.5 ----7.76 8.6 -- Sriveerakul et al (2007) 5.6--10.0 Well rounded --1--6 10 1.1--6.8 a Indicate the optimum value suggested by the investigator.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Some of the previous models reported by refs. [5,13,14] take the compressibility of air into account. But all these models were developed for liquid as the motive fluid and Table 1 Mass ratio correlations from dimensionless analysis given by various authors [10] the gas as the entrained fluid.…”
Section: Mass Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various authors [4,5,8,[11][12][13][14] have attempted to predict the entrainment rate based on momentum and energy balances across different sections of the ejector. Table 2 shows the geometry of ejectors and the respective correlations obtained through such analysis as available in literature.…”
Section: Mass Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Correlations have been developed to predict pressure drop and gas holdup as a function of different physical and dynamic variables. Studies have also been reported in a downflow column with a simultaneous gas liquid injection nozzle by Ben Brahim et al [4] and Bando et al [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%