1971
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.26.239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Momentum Nonconservation and the Low-Temperature Resistivity of Alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
16
0
2

Year Published

1972
1972
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…2 we find b∕d ¼ 1.95 AE 0.15ð10 −5 K −2 Þ, in reasonable agreement with the theoretical expectation. The T 3 resistivity in this temperature range (vs. a T 5 form) is typical for metallic samples with residual resistivities ρ 0 ≥ 1 nΩ · cm (14,16); our single-crystal Cr is 99.996 þ % pure and has ρ 0 ≈ 0.1 μΩ · cm (compared to ρ 0 ≈ 1.4 μΩ · cm in critically doped Cr∶V 3.2% (8)). The electron mean-free path in our samples is estimated to be λ > 400 Å at base-T for all pressures P < P c , where λ is calculated from the Author contributions: R.J., Y.F., and T.F.R.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2 we find b∕d ¼ 1.95 AE 0.15ð10 −5 K −2 Þ, in reasonable agreement with the theoretical expectation. The T 3 resistivity in this temperature range (vs. a T 5 form) is typical for metallic samples with residual resistivities ρ 0 ≥ 1 nΩ · cm (14,16); our single-crystal Cr is 99.996 þ % pure and has ρ 0 ≈ 0.1 μΩ · cm (compared to ρ 0 ≈ 1.4 μΩ · cm in critically doped Cr∶V 3.2% (8)). The electron mean-free path in our samples is estimated to be λ > 400 Å at base-T for all pressures P < P c , where λ is calculated from the Author contributions: R.J., Y.F., and T.F.R.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…2B where we plot ρðT 3 Þ, and for each pressure we limit the temperature range to T > T N in order to emphasize ρ PM ðTÞ. The T 3 coefficient b varies by less than 6% between samples and is well described by metallic transport due to phonon scattering in the presence of a weakly inelastic nonphonon scattering channel (14).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It collapses as a function of pressure, with the low-temperature rise in ρ(T ) disappearing at P c = 7.5 kbar. The temperature dependence of ρ for T > T min when P < P c and for all T < 100 K for P > P c follows a T 3 power law expected from phonon scattering in a disordered metal alloy [8]. Although T min (P ) tracks P c , the full T-dependence of the electrical resistivity at P ∼ P c appears oblivious to the existence of the QCP, even under the magnifying glass of pressure tuning.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Recent experiments, however, show that there are substantial deviations from it [l]. The causes ascribed to this deviation are (i) the inelastic scattering of conduction electrons by the change in the form of the impurity potential due to strain of the surrounding lattice [2], (ii) the inelastic electron-phonon scattering [3], (iii) the anisotropy of lattice vibrations [4] and Fermi surfaces [5, 61, (iv) the incoherent and inelastic scattering of conduction electrons by local modes [7], (v) the difference in the anisotropies of relaxation times for phonon and impurity scatterings [8], analysed in terms of the two-band model [9, 101, (vi) the interference between the phonon and impurity scatterings [ll], (vii) the breakdown in the conservation of crystal momentum [12,131, and (viii) the phonon drag effect [14]. However, only causes (iv), (v), and (vi) are found to be significant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%