2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00039-010-0044-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moments of Two-Variable Functions and the Uniqueness of Graph Limits

Abstract: For a symmetric bounded measurable function W on [0, 1] 2 and a simple graph F , the homomorphism density

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
211
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(214 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
211
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, by now there are analytic proofs: Janson and Diaconis [13] showed that it also follows from results of Hoover and Kallenberg on exchangeable arrays. A direct (and far from simple) proof has recently been given by Borgs, Chayes and Lovász [8].…”
Section: Consequences For Branching Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, by now there are analytic proofs: Janson and Diaconis [13] showed that it also follows from results of Hoover and Kallenberg on exchangeable arrays. A direct (and far from simple) proof has recently been given by Borgs, Chayes and Lovász [8].…”
Section: Consequences For Branching Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lovász and Szegedy [13] showed that every convergent sequence of graphs has a limiting graphon. This graphon need not be unique, but it is unique up to a certain type of measure preserving transformation [1], which in some sense corresponds to permutations of the vertices of a graph; two graphons equivalent in this sense are called weakly isomorphic. See [1,10] for more details.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, z m k and add the polynomial p − 1 to P , getting a set P ′ such that the cut norm between W P and W P ′ is very small (for the same values of z i ). We eventually set Z to be the intersection of Z k × [0,1] N over all k ∈ N. The existence of the subsets Z k follows from an application of the Implicit Function Theorem. During the proof, we need to prevent the intersection of Z k × [0, 1] N from becoming degenerate (to guarantee the existence of the bijective function f in Theorem 3).…”
Section: Theorem 3 There Exist a Family Of Graphonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Austin [1], Bollobás and Riordan [3], Borgs, Chayes and Lovász [4], Lovász [16], Diaconis and Janson [10], Janson [13]. We recall only a few definitions; these will help to fix our notation.…”
Section: Graph Limits and Kernelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since every kernel is equivalent to some kernel on [0, 1], every graph limit may be represented by a kernel W on [0, 1], equipped with Lebesgue measure λ, but even then W is not unique. Detailed results are in Borgs, Chayes and Lovász [4], Bollobás and Riordan [3] and Janson [13].…”
Section: Graph Limitsmentioning
confidence: 99%