2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moment–shear–axial force interaction in composite beams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparison shows that the present FE model is able to accurately predict the initial stiffness, ultimate strength, and post-buckling behavior of the specimen (Figure 1). The material stress–strain curve of the steel assumed to be similar to one reported by Kirkland et al (2015) with yield stress of 358 MPa.…”
Section: Numerical Study For Development Of Moment–shear Yield Surfacementioning
confidence: 93%
“…The comparison shows that the present FE model is able to accurately predict the initial stiffness, ultimate strength, and post-buckling behavior of the specimen (Figure 1). The material stress–strain curve of the steel assumed to be similar to one reported by Kirkland et al (2015) with yield stress of 358 MPa.…”
Section: Numerical Study For Development Of Moment–shear Yield Surfacementioning
confidence: 93%
“…The proposed element proved its capability when compared to experimental results. Kirkland et al (2015) [11] studied the axial force-shear-moment interaction for composite beams and developed a finite element formulation which gave good predictions compared with experimental tests. They developed a design approach for shear and flexure interaction of axially loaded beams.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Steel components are relatively thin and prone to buckling while concrete can restrain these against buckling, concrete also gives protection against corrosion provides thermal insulation at high temperatures and steel provides ductility into the structure. A rigid-plastic analysis of a composite beam section indicates that the positive moment capacity of a member can be increased by as much as 120% relative to the bare steel beam through composite action [4]. Moreover, the common solid concrete slab with a depth of 75 mm to 100 mm thick provides lateral-torsional buckling resistance to the top flange [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%