1990
DOI: 10.1016/0010-2180(90)90033-n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moment approximations for probability density functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in Derksen and Sullivan (1990), the Jacobi orthogonal polynomial expansion, where the leading term is a simple beta function, is described. The directly measured expected mass fraction function can be compared with the results in Schopflocher et al (2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, in Derksen and Sullivan (1990), the Jacobi orthogonal polynomial expansion, where the leading term is a simple beta function, is described. The directly measured expected mass fraction function can be compared with the results in Schopflocher et al (2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Fig. 5, the measured EMFs are compared with the beta function with parameters found from the measured first and second moments following the procedure given in Derksen and Sullivan (1990). The results using the far-field asymptotic moments for the α−β prescription, given in the Appendix,M…”
Section: Experimental Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is expected that a good approximation of the PDF and EMF can be found by using a limited number of the lower ordered moments (Derksen and Sullivan 1990, Lewis and Chatwin 1996, Schopflocher and Sullivan 2002. The procedure here will be to select a parametric expression for the EMF and determine the value of the parameters from these moments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Even in the absence of a parametric model, and with an incomplete set of measured moments, one can still obtain an accurate representation of the density (using an orthogonal polynomial expansion, for example). In practice, the first three or four sample moments are enough to capture the bulk characteristics of the PDF (Derksen and Sullivan, 1990). If one wishes to retrieve the more subtle features of the probability distribution, higher-order moments are required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%