1983
DOI: 10.1016/0031-9201(83)90031-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moment and duration of shallow earthquakes from Love-wave modelling for regional distances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The total geometric moment of Model 3 amounts to 2.0 × 10 9 m 3 , and using a value for shear rigidity appropriate to basement rocks G b (see Table 1), this corresponds to a seismic moment of approximately 4.0 × 10 26 dyne cm. These values are in close agreement with the geodetic estimate of Ruegg et al [1982] and the seismic estimates by Yielding [1985], Deschamps et al [1982] and Brustle and Muller [1983].…”
Section: Results From Forward Elastic Dislocation Modeling Of the 198supporting
confidence: 91%
“…The total geometric moment of Model 3 amounts to 2.0 × 10 9 m 3 , and using a value for shear rigidity appropriate to basement rocks G b (see Table 1), this corresponds to a seismic moment of approximately 4.0 × 10 26 dyne cm. These values are in close agreement with the geodetic estimate of Ruegg et al [1982] and the seismic estimates by Yielding [1985], Deschamps et al [1982] and Brustle and Muller [1983].…”
Section: Results From Forward Elastic Dislocation Modeling Of the 198supporting
confidence: 91%
“…In general, the horizontal component data are better fit by the synthetics than are the vertical component data. Brustle & Muller (1983) also noted better fits for Love wave seismograms than Rayleigh wave seismograms, suggesting that Rayleigh waves are apparently more influenced by the details of crustal structure and lateral velocity variations.…”
Section: Moment Tensor Inversionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Twelve of the 66 instrumental couples have a γ > 40°( our aforementioned arbitrary limit), which is a high value for modern DCs of the same event. Additionally, the largest γ Figure 8b but from the minimum variance Model 1-CFTI of Table 5. values (refer to the white columns in Figure 5 and to Figure 6) belong to the couples including DCs calculated from surface waves [Deschamps and King, 1983;Brüstle and Müller, 1983] and the somewhat anomalous solution by Sipkin [1987], who used body waves.…”
Section: The 1980 Rotation Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%