1991
DOI: 10.1021/ja00018a014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molybdenum(V) sites in xanthine oxidase and relevant analog complexes: comparison of molybdenum-95 and sulfur-33 hyperfine coupling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
95
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
17
95
1
Order By: Relevance
“…S angle of 107.33(14)°is also greater than that of Tp iPr MoOS-(OC6 H 4 s Bu) (103.7(2)°), 4 consistent with trends observed in dioxo-Mo(VI) and -Mo(V) complexes. 53,54 Significantly, the Mo ---S bond in 9 is much shorter than that reported for PPh 4 [MoOS(L-N 2 S 2 )] (2.36 Å by EXAFS) 1 but close to the range established for XnO-VR (2.0 ± 0.2 Å).…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…S angle of 107.33(14)°is also greater than that of Tp iPr MoOS-(OC6 H 4 s Bu) (103.7(2)°), 4 consistent with trends observed in dioxo-Mo(VI) and -Mo(V) complexes. 53,54 Significantly, the Mo ---S bond in 9 is much shorter than that reported for PPh 4 [MoOS(L-N 2 S 2 )] (2.36 Å by EXAFS) 1 but close to the range established for XnO-VR (2.0 ± 0.2 Å).…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…[39] These absorptions are found at lower energy than those of the corresponding neutral molybdenum(VI) complex 1 featuring ν = 930, 902 cm -1 . [16] DFT calculations of models of 1 and 1 - [19] predict a shift (scaled by 0.9614 [40] ) from ν = 940, 914 cm [41] The EPR signal of the Mo V state of formate dehydrogenase is also reported to be split by proton coupling with A iso ( 1 H) = 16 G. [42] The anisotropic EPR spectra of frozen solutions of 1 -, 7 and 8 are shown in Figures 7, 8, and 9. All observed g values are Ͻ 2.0, and hyperfine coupling to 95/97 Mo isotopes is also detected.…”
Section: One-electron Oxidation Of 5a-5c (Momentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Yield: 496 mg (60 %). C 41 + . Due to the presence of OPMePh 2 , which could not be separated by precipitation or recrystallization (chromatography was also unsuccessful due to decomposition), satisfying elemental analyses could not be obtained.…”
Section: Synthesis Of 5cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the g-tensor orientations were unknown, the eigenvectors of the Mo(V) g-tensor for the slow signal were assigned by symmetry considerations (see Table 1), assuming that the g//axis is lying along the normal to the equatorial ligand plane. This assumption is based on the previous EPR results that showed that the slow signal is associated with a Mo(V) site with C s or C 2 point symmetry [51] and also on results obtained from single crystal EPR spectroscopy and molecular orbital calculations on a nearly square pyramidal coordination Mo(V) complex in which the g//axis is lying nearly along the apical bond [52]. The principal directions of FeS 1 were also chosen from symmetry considerations, but permutations for the x, y, and z values were performed until the best agreement with the experimental spectrum was reached.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Mo(v)-fes 1 Magnetic Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%